Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550393

Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research

Newsgroups sci.physics
Date 2016-02-03 19:16 -0800
References <Ovudne2Lj4NuZTrLnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> <bJidnV9zo597YTfLnZ2dnUU7-cWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <d8aef2bf-89f6-4318-9eb6-67e4465292c6@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <3cff3488-d49f-4d53-a032-e47ac784c213@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research
From "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wednesday, February 3, 2016 at 6:17:29 AM UTC-8, john wrote:
> How do you know that the star-arms
> adjacent to ours AREN'T antimatter?
> The emr is the same.
> Odd says, "Oh, there would be annihilations!!",
> but not if they repel each other.

  Logic fail.

  If matter and antimatter repel each other, why would both accumulate in the same galaxy?


  Mark L. Fergerson

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 16:53 -0600
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 00:02 +0000
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-01-26 21:48 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-27 06:19 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:23 -0500
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 02:18 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 16:36 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-28 23:12 +0000
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 17:23 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 01:31 +0000
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-28 19:54 -0600
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 07:30 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 17:32 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-03 17:33 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:19 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 13:38 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 19:54 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:03 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 20:18 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 14:35 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:49 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:22 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:44 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-02-03 23:35 +0000
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 15:53 -0800
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-01-29 02:16 +0000
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-01-28 14:35 -0800
  Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-01-29 00:47 -0500
    Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 06:17 -0800
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 11:06 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-03 19:16 -0800
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 02:36 -0800
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:58 -0600
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 07:55 -0800
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:12 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:31 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:34 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:39 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:17 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:19 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:26 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:36 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 09:49 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:56 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:02 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 12:03 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:22 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 12:42 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 11:06 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 10:46 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-04 16:53 +0000
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 18:27 -0500
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 18:39 -0800
        Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 08:10 -0600
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 06:34 -0800
          Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 19:02 -0500
            Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 17:23 -0800
              Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:04 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:41 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 07:57 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:21 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 08:47 -0600
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:56 -0800
                Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 09:13 -0600
      Re: Neutral result charges up antimatter research Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2016-02-04 11:45 -0500

csiph-web