Re: Why does gravity exist? How does gravity attract materials?

From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity exist? How does gravity attract materials?
Date	2018-03-29 03:02 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID	<3166827.iIbC2pHGDl@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <p9et7u$mgp$1@gioia.aioe.org> <gmIuC.183411$f35.135975@fx23.am4> <p9fm9s$1qit$1@gioia.aioe.org> <IILuC.263223$_91.188714@fx02.am4> <p9h677$frj$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Dino Bruniera wrote:

> First of all, thanks for the information you gave me.

If only you had understood it.

> The fact is that I think I have found the preferred reference frame,
> which is the reference frame of the CMBR.

Despite all corrections and recommendations to you to study, you *still* 
have no clue what you are talking about.  How sad.

> There are also other people who have suggested that the CMBR is the
> preferred reference frame,

They must be equally un(der)educated, then.

> but I think that I also managed to prove it in the article you can find at
> the following link:
> [spam]

No, you did not.  This is just pseudo-scientific word salad mixed with 
fallacies and misconceptions.  I actually started to provide short 
corrections to each point, but since I ended up correcting almost every word 
in the incredibly long, unbroken first sentence, I stopped at line 2 of the 
abstract (with HD resolution and browser window in fullscreen mode).

Vada via!  Go away and do not come back until you have studied what you are 
talking about.

Here are the subjects that you have no clue about, and that you really need 
to study, probably not in that order (this is just the order in which you 
refer to these concepts, often without knowing, in your abstract):

- CMB(R)
- speed of light
- isotropy
- transit
- Michelson-Morley experiment
- reference frame
- Lorentz ether theory
- length contraction
- time dilation
- special relativity
- photons, especially photon energy and how it is calculated
- stars (the astronomical objects, not the celebrities)
- galaxies
- Maxwellian electrodynamics
- physical conditions in interstellar and intergalactic space
- scientific truth
- scientific theory
- quantum mechanics
- redshift
- gravity, especially in general relativity
- Doppler effect
- universal expansion
- scientific community

> Also I wrote a second article, which you can find at the link
> [spam]
> which explains the phenomena covered by GR in a way compatible with the
> preferred reference frame.

Ex falso quodlibet.

> But I have some difficulty finding italian physicists willing to read
> and evaluate my articles.

Probably because it is pseudo-scientific nonsense, refuted by observation.

You must realize that observation of the universe trumps all ideas and 
theories people can have about the universe.  Science works by 
falsification: if it is not possible to falsify a theory, then it is not 
science.  (Therefore, some physicists doubt whether string theory is 
actually a theory.)

You should really take the time to watch this excellent science talk to 
perhaps clarify at least some of your misconceptions:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaGktVQdNg>

There are no subtitles in Italian directly, but there are in English
(auto-generated) whose auto-translation to Italian you might find 
understandable and useful.

PointedEars
-- 
Heisenberg is out for a drive when he's stopped by a traffic cop. 
The officer asks him "Do you know how fast you were going?" 
Heisenberg replies "No, but I know where I am."
(from: WolframAlpha)

Thread