Re: Why does gravity exist? How does gravity attract materials?

From	Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: Why does gravity exist? How does gravity attract materials?
Followup-To	poster
Date	2018-04-02 09:01 +0200
Organization	PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID	<1988605.72vocr9iq0@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References	(23 earlier) <p9qhrb$17hu$1@gioia.aioe.org> <5887299.G0QQBjFxQf@PointedEars.de> <p9reju$mi2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <14936174.geO5KgaWL5@PointedEars.de> <p9roa4$158p$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Followups directed to: poster

Dino Bruniera wrote:

> Il 01/04/2018 23:11, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ha scritto:
>> Dino Bruniera wrote:
>>> Il 01/04/2018 18:17, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn ha scritto:
>>>> You essentially claim that different frequency (“not isotropic”) must
>>>> mean different speed (“not isotropic”).  Your claim is *wrong*.
>>> Yes, but only for the CMBR.
>> Utter nonsense.  The CMBR is EM radiation; it is not different from any
>> other EM radiation in that regard.
> 
> The photons of the CMBR are different from the other photons, because
> their frequency is substantially isotropic compared to the CMBR
> reference frame.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong>

> And as Tom Robert also wrote in another post.

Which, as I have told you, you have completely misunderstood in that it (or 
he) would support your idea of a “preferred reference frame”.

> It seems to me that we are losing a lot of time because you have not 
> read my short article, where I wrote what I mean by CMBR isotropy.

No, I am wasting *my* precious free time when talking to you because you 
insist that you know what you are talking about even though you clearly 
don’t.

> > The speed of light, the (phase) speed of EM waves, is constant and the 
> > same for all observers and sources, therefore the (phase) speed of the
> > CMBR is constant and the same for all observers and sources.  Until
> > there is evidence to the contrary, the laws of physics are the same in
> > all parts of the universe.
> 
> This is what special relativity states

You don’t get it, do you?  This is what *observation* showed/shows, 
*regardless* what special relativity says.

BTW, it is also what Lorentz’ ether theory said and what modern LET says.

Enough now.  You have made it abundantly clear:

You think that you understand everything, even though you clearly don’t.

You do not want to study, even though you have been given detailed 
explanations of what you misunderstood, and lots of pointers what you need
to study in order to gain a proper understanding of the concepts that you 
are employing.

You do not seek peer review, because you *ignore* all reviews.

You are just another crackpot.  All you seek here is *attention*.

And I will not give it to you anymore.  *PLONK*

F’up2 poster

PointedEars
-- 
Heisenberg is out for a drive when he's stopped by a traffic cop. 
The officer asks him "Do you know how fast you were going?" 
Heisenberg replies "No, but I know where I am."
(from: WolframAlpha)

Thread