Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.cbm > #6770

Re: The C64 is crap!

From Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.cbm
Subject Re: The C64 is crap!
Date 2016-01-30 18:16 +1300
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <300120161816401511%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <87mvrwm4i0.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <240120161008159860%YourName@YourISP.com> <87k2myvak4.fsf@usenet.ankman.de> <250120161409109334%YourName@YourISP.com> <n8h3n4$qif$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <n8h3n4$qif$1@dont-email.me>, Dombo
<dombo@disposable.invalid> wrote:
> Op 25-Jan-16 om 2:09 schreef Your Name:
> > 
> > Also, the Apple II loads at least some part of the system software from
> > the disk, whereas the C64 could be booted and used without anything
> > extra. I don't know about the Atari 400 / 800 - I never bothered with
> > them since they were crap, although nowhere near as useless as
> > Sinclair's garbage toys.
> 
> As luck would have it I've just repaired a Apple II clone (I'm a 
> Commodore guy, but this was a fun exercise). The Apple II doesn't 
> require a disk; it has BASIC in ROM. That might not be obvious for the 
> uninitiated because it starts up in the machine language monitor, with 
> Ctrl+B followed by Return you go to the BASIC prompt.

An "Apple II clone" isn't an "Apple II".  :-)

It depends on what you're wanting to do, what model of Apple II it is,
etc.

Back to comp.sys.cbm | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The C64 is crap! "Harald Habenichts" <po@p.o> - 2016-01-12 22:28 +0100
  Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-13 13:17 +1300
    Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Robert.Wolfe@f18.n116.z1.fidonet.org (Robert Wolfe) - 2016-01-12 20:33 +1200
      Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-13 18:17 +1300
        Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-13 18:10 -0500
          Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 13:39 +1300
            Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-14 17:24 -0500
              Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-15 13:11 +1300
                Re: The C64 is crap! aowen10@mail.bbk.ac.uk - 2016-01-15 08:58 -0800
                Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-15 16:05 -0500
                Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-16 12:35 +1300
  Re: The C64 is crap! AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-01-13 07:32 +0000
    Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:36 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2016-01-13 10:09 +0100
    Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 13:42 +1300
    Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:37 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-01-13 03:44 -0800
    Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-14 10:33 +1300
  Re: The C64 is crap! Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2016-01-14 06:10 +0800
  Re: The C64 is crap! "Brian-Gaff" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 08:35 +0000
    Re: The C64 is crap! Guesser <alistair@zxnet.co.uk> - 2016-01-14 15:24 +0000
  Re: The C64 is crap! Jan van den Broek <fortytwo@xs4all.nl> - 2016-01-21 22:31 +0100
    Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-21 18:05 -0500
      Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-22 20:42 +1200
        Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-23 15:21 -0500
          Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-24 10:06 +1300
          Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-24 10:08 +1300
            Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-24 18:10 -0500
              Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-25 14:09 +1300
                Re: The C64 is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-30 02:33 +0100
                Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 18:16 +1300
                Re: The C64 is crap! Andreas Kohlbach <janrat.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-01-30 14:54 -0500
                Re: The C64 is crap! Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2016-02-01 10:36 +0200
              Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-26 19:45 +1200
          Re: The C64 is crap! removemefirst.Drew.Klenotic@f1701.n2215.z1.fidonet.org (Drew Klenotic) - 2016-01-26 19:38 +1200
            Re: The C64 is crap! Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2016-01-29 23:12 +0100
              Re: The C64 is crap! Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2016-01-30 12:39 +1300
      Re: The C64 is junk! nospam.Ed.Vance@f1.n770.z1437.fidonet.org (Ed Vance) - 2016-02-18 10:23 +1200
        Re: The C64 is junk! Andreas Kohlbach <febr.9.ankman@spamgourmet.net> - 2016-02-19 15:57 -0500
  The C64 is crap! Terry Raymond <traymond20@gmail.com> - 2016-02-08 14:19 -0800

csiph-web