Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534611
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna |
| Date | 2015-11-22 21:06 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <2cn9ic-9qh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <2015112117265771652-earlejones@comcastnet> <RbCdnWiqjfq0jM_LnZ2dnUU7-dmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <aki9ic-kah.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <caad3f85-4e00-4122-9fbf-fae73ba91e2e@googlegroups.com> |
Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 11:46:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 11/21/15 7:26 PM, Earle Jones27 wrote: >> >> The optimum length of a long-wire antenna is one that reaches from the >> >> transmitter to the receiver. >> >> >> > >> > Fiber optic. >> >> Obviously you have never paid for such out of your own pocket. >> >> >> >> -- >> Jim Pennino > > It's twice the wavelength. > > (For what you get.) > > What with frequency modulation > instead of amplitude modulation, > then, seems you'd want a "harp". Is any of that supposed to mean something or is it just the random, babbling word salad it looks like? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Optimum length of a long-wire antenna Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2015-11-21 17:26 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:11 -0500
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 13:02 -0600
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:45 +0000
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 12:57 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 21:06 +0000
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 13:20 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 23:18 +0000
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 16:43 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 01:13 +0000
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:10 -0500
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 19:05 +0000
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 12:07 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:00 -0500
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 14:49 -0800
Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:18 -0500
csiph-web