Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #534869

Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna

Show all headers | View raw

Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 12:10:48 AM UTC-8, benj wrote:
>> On 11/22/2015 08:13 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> > Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 3:31:09 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>> Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 1:16:06 PM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>>>> Ross A. Finlayson <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 11:46:07 AM UTC-8, ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On 11/21/15 7:26 PM, Earle Jones27 wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> The optimum length of a long-wire antenna is one that reaches from the
>> >>>>>>>>> transmitter to the receiver.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>    Fiber optic.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Obviously you have never paid for such out of your own pocket.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Jim Pennino
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It's twice the wavelength.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> (For what you get.)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> What with frequency modulation
>> >>>>>> instead of amplitude modulation,
>> >>>>>> then, seems you'd want a "harp".
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Is any of that supposed to mean something or is it just the random,
>> >>>>> babbling word salad it looks like?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Jim Pennino
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You can thank Nyquist and Shannon for that.
>> >>>
>> >>> I take it that Nyquist and Shannon have you dazzed and confused beyond
>> >>> all hope.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Jim Pennino
>> >>
>> >> Maybe you'd be happier with
>> >> Jacob Wolfowitz and Stanford Goldman.
>> >>
>> >> How about:  Huffman?
>> >>
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_Richard_W._Hamming_Medal
>> >>
>> >> Here this is for "signal processing" of the
>> >> "resonant frequencies of antenna material
>> >> in electrical fields including atmospheric
>> >> radio frequency fields".
>> >>
>> >> We can just go back to Fourier for a bunch
>> >> of this too.
>> >
>> > Do you have a point or is that just the beanie you are wearing?
>> >
>> > BTW genius, information theory and antenna theory are two different fields.
>> 
>> Jim, this is what happens when people "know" a bunch of stuff but have 
>> no idea what it all means. Happens here all the time.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Thanks, I was quite flattered for a moment 
> and we can't have that now can we  - here 
> the notion that basic fundamentals for the 
> theory for the applications comprise the 
> "Yogi Berra" difference between theory and 
> practice (in theory there's no difference, 
> in practice there is) - still, this is 
> science not engineering, for having the 
> tiniest decoder with the most, not the 
> encyclopedia of code books to throw in 
> the woodstove each day.
> 
> https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Yogi_Berra#Misattributed
 
I think this poster is a bot.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Optimum length of a long-wire antenna Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2015-11-21 17:26 -0800
  Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 01:11 -0500
  Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 13:02 -0600
    Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 19:45 +0000
      Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 12:57 -0800
        Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 21:06 +0000
          Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 13:20 -0800
            Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-22 23:18 +0000
              Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 16:43 -0800
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 01:13 +0000
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:10 -0500
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 10:54 -0800
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-23 19:05 +0000
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 12:07 -0800
                Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 00:00 -0500
  Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-11-22 14:49 -0800
    Re: Optimum length of a long-wire antenna benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-23 03:18 -0500

csiph-web