Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15621
| Message-ID | <2888099.tS28u2qBPk@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-08-30 17:47 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (1 earlier) <k1lopg$qsm$1@news.albasani.net> <4191624.W6QT1uhmCP@PointedEars.de> <KwGUp1Cpm2PQFwgv@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <2708624.1MEYokBNaJ@PointedEars.de> <2DfkyKFfY4PQFwEP@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
John G Harris wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> For crying out loud… >> >>| 2 Conformance >>| >>| […] >>| A conforming implementation of ECMAScript is permitted to support >>| program >>| and regular expression syntax not described in this specification. […] >> >> This, if nothing else, is sufficient to make it standards-compliant. > > For crying out loud, it's still a syntax error! No, it would be "program […] syntax not described in this specification". > Unless, of course, you have made it clear you are talking about the > syntax spec for the browser, if, of course, the browser maker has > published one that shows this feature, which it hasn't. > > If you'd said it's a permitted browser deviation we would have agreed, > and then pointed out that it's a bloody stupid deviation. You have no clue what you are talking about. Troll elsewhere. PointedEars -- Sometimes, what you learn is wrong. If those wrong ideas are close to the root of the knowledge tree you build on a particular subject, pruning the bad branches can sometimes cause the whole tree to collapse. -- Mike Duffy in cljs, <news:Xns9FB6521286DB8invalidcom@94.75.214.39>
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 13:55 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-29 20:02 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement RobG <rgqld@iinet.net.au> - 2012-08-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 12:37 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 14:24 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 15:59 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-08-30 16:26 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-30 17:47 +0200
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-09-01 11:40 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Dr J R Stockton <reply1235@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-09-02 19:54 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 11:17 -0500
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-30 10:25 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Dr J R Stockton <reply1235@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-31 23:20 +0100
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-31 16:03 -0700
Re: Semicolons and the do..while statement Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-29 22:30 +0200
csiph-web