Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20975

Re: c.l.js

Show all headers | View raw

Christoph Michael Becker wrote:

> John Harris wrote:
>> Christoph Michael Becker wrote:
>>> So I suggest to stick with the generally accepted facts: there is
>>> JavaScript[TM], there is ECMAScript--but there is no javascript (at
>>> least _i_ cOnSiDeR cOrReT cApiTalIsAtIoN aN iMpOrTaNt cOnCePt, john).
>> 
>> There is also LiveScript, JScript[TM], ActionScript, and probably a
>> few more.
>> 
>> LiveScript was not, is not, and never will be a dialect of ECMAScript.
>> This is because ECMAScript is derived from LiveScript.
> 
> Obviously you're talking about Netscape's LiveScript (not the indirect
> descendant of CoffeeScript with the same name).  IMO the reason that
> LiveScript was not, is not, and never will be a "dialect of ECMAScript"
> is, that it was renamed to JavaScript long before ECMAScript was going
> to be standardized.

Assuming there was such a thing as a “dialect of ECMAScript”, neither would 
be Mocha and JavaScript 1.0.  However, this is a purely academical 
discussion now as Mocha, LiveScript, and all JavaScript versions before 1.3 
(Netscape 4.0 [1997], for some people even after that) went the way of the 
dinosaur, and are no longer discussed here on a regular basis.
 
> Anyway, if replying to a support request with (at least partial)
> constructive criticism, instead of just serving the answer, gives this
> newsgroup a lousy reputation, I'm gladly willing to bear with it.

Also, when you post here, it is never a support request.  This is _not_ a 
support forum, it is a *newsgroup* (where people are discussing subjects).

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production David Karr <davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 16:29 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-08-13 16:52 -0700
    Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production David Karr <davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 17:27 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-14 11:24 +0200
    Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-14 14:48 +0100
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-08-14 14:32 -0400
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-14 19:43 +0100
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-08-15 18:51 -0300
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-16 02:28 +0200
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-08-15 20:12 -0600
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-16 11:29 +0100
          c.l.js (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-16 23:57 +0200
            Re: c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 10:17 +0200
              Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-18 15:14 +0100
            Re: c.l.js (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-18 15:51 +0100
              Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-18 17:14 +0200
                Re: c.l.js Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-18 16:44 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-18 17:52 +0200
                Re: c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 19:28 +0200
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-19 15:42 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-20 06:58 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:10 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 07:55 +1000
                [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-21 06:47 +0200
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-21 15:50 +0100
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-21 23:13 +0200
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-22 11:05 +0100
                Quoting in c.l.js (was: [OT] How to find messages by ID) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-22 15:06 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js (was: [OT] How to find messages by ID) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-24 10:05 +0100
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-09-01 22:32 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-02 00:08 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-09-02 15:52 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-20 01:06 +0200
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:14 +0100
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-19 16:07 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-20 07:01 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:20 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 08:02 +1000
                Re: c.l.js Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-20 23:29 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 14:59 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-21 16:05 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-22 07:43 +1000
        [FAQ] “javascript” (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 11:36 +0200
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Carlos Pedro <carlospedr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-15 04:28 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production richarduie@yahoo.com - 2013-08-18 08:21 -0700

csiph-web