Re: c.l.js

Date	2013-08-21 08:02 +1000
From	Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: c.l.js
References	(5 earlier) <2rn119hkoraus5pcu97kpn92tv3mk5badq@4ax.com> <5210e490$0$6624$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <c5d419pi4q5fml29ibt1im6klssfr55f6e@4ax.com> <aLKdnaoN5doGGo_PnZ2dnUVZ_qkAAAAA@westnet.com.au> <n92719pknktgdrthbe5la8s0532fq532eq@4ax.com>
Message-ID	<Iqqdnaor6_oWeo7PnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@westnet.com.au> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 21/08/2013 1:20 AM, John Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:01:00 +1000, Andrew Poulos
> <ap_prog@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 20/08/2013 1:07 AM, John Harris wrote:
>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:14:27 +0200, Christoph Michael Becker
>>> <cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Harris wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 23:57:20 +0200, Christoph Michael Becker
>>>>> <cmbecker69@arcor.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if Thomas' answer didn't address the OP's alleged problem, it did
>>>>>> give valuable hints about the posted code, the usage of the name
>>>>>> "javascript" and posting via Google Groups.
>>>>>     <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> So you seriously believe that
>>>>> It is absolutely forbidden to use Google to post to this news group;
>>>>> It is forbidden to use a uk.*-approved attribution in this news group;
>>>>> It is forbidden to use pen names when posting to this news group.
>>>>
>>>> No, I don't think that it's forbidden (and I didn't say so).  But one
>>>> should be aware that posting via Google groups is likely to produce
>>>> messages that are hard to read and even harder to reply to,
>>>
>>> Thomas has said very firmly that you mustn't use Google, so you are
>>> disagreeing with him. That makes you a troll and an idiot, he has
>>> said, too often.
>>
>> You certainly like a stretch to try and cause distress to others.
>
> I don't know what you mean by "stretch", but if you mean exaggerate
> then you've not remembered what Thomas has been saying over the last
> year or so.

As far as I can tell Thomas has never forbidden anyone from doing 
anything (he can't as its an unmoderated newsgroup). In fact, you 
yourself stated that "Thomas has said very firmly that you mustn't 
use..." so to me the intent of your email was to cause distress.

Andrew Poulos

Thread

require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production David Karr <davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 16:29 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-08-13 16:52 -0700
    Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production David Karr <davidmichaelkarr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 17:27 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-14 11:24 +0200
    Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-14 14:48 +0100
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Jim T. <x@y.z> - 2013-08-14 14:32 -0400
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-14 19:43 +0100
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2013-08-15 18:51 -0300
      Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-16 02:28 +0200
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2013-08-15 20:12 -0600
        Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-16 11:29 +0100
          c.l.js (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-16 23:57 +0200
            Re: c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 10:17 +0200
              Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-18 15:14 +0100
            Re: c.l.js (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-18 15:51 +0100
              Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-18 17:14 +0200
                Re: c.l.js Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-18 16:44 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-18 17:52 +0200
                Re: c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 19:28 +0200
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-19 15:42 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-20 06:58 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:10 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 07:55 +1000
                [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-21 06:47 +0200
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-21 15:50 +0100
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-21 23:13 +0200
                Re: [OT] How to find messages by ID (was: c.l.js) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-22 11:05 +0100
                Quoting in c.l.js (was: [OT] How to find messages by ID) Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-22 15:06 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js (was: [OT] How to find messages by ID) John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-24 10:05 +0100
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-09-01 22:32 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-09-02 00:08 +0200
                Re: Quoting in c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-09-02 15:52 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-20 01:06 +0200
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:14 +0100
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-19 16:07 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-20 07:01 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-20 16:20 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 08:02 +1000
                Re: c.l.js Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-08-20 23:29 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-21 14:59 +1000
                Re: c.l.js John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-21 16:05 +0100
                Re: c.l.js Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-22 07:43 +1000
        [FAQ] “javascript” (was: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-18 11:36 +0200
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production Carlos Pedro <carlospedr@gmail.com> - 2013-08-15 04:28 -0700
  Re: require.js in a phantomjs test fails for code that works fine in production richarduie@yahoo.com - 2013-08-18 08:21 -0700

csiph-web