Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #20883
| Message-ID | <2671878.XpRBlBdN4Y@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2013-08-07 09:15 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <4c6c557e-09b1-4117-ba72-352423cde08c@googlegroups.com> <67a00337-03f2-43d1-aaa3-ee26cf2488d6@googlegroups.com> |
Simeon Chaos wrote: > Paste some experimental code I have written today, which verifies the > feasibility of my ideas. > coffeescript Language: > […] > Or maybe I made some mistakes in my ideas? I would appreciate you opinions > very much. You should post to a newsgroup where the people subscribed to it are more familiar with the programming language you are using, or at least interested in the language you are attempting to parse with it. In particular, how *exactly* does your posting relate to ECMAScript implementations? That CoffeeScript transcompiles to an ECMAScript implementation, that Brendan Eich says it has influenced his thinking about the future of JavaScript™ and ECMAScript, and that both CoffeeScript and J(ava)Script/ECMAScript have “script” in it, does not mean that CoffeeScript is on-topic here. CoffeeScript is not an ECMAScript implementation. Further reading: <http://net.tutsplus.com/articles/interviews/should-you-learn-coffeescript/> ISTM from just scanning your posting that it presents that general an approach that it belongs in newsgroup dealing with computer science in general instead, for proper review. Perhaps comp.compilers (moderated). However, Michael has pointed out that your proposal is lacking scientific research, so it may be better not to (re-)post it at all at this point. Also, you should post to Usenet using your real (transliterated) name (Cao Xingming?), and not via Google Groups’ (currently) borken or any other (current, therefore likely buggy) Web interface. For example, the more than 80 printable characters per line that Google Groups is producing by default are – with few exceptions – not appropriate here. <http://jibbering.com/faq/#posting> <http://PointedEars.de/faq#posting> -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner Simeon Chaos <simeon.chaos@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 09:09 -0700
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner Simeon Chaos <simeon.chaos@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 09:10 -0700
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-08-06 17:15 -0700
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner Simeon Chaos <simeon.chaos@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 20:35 -0700
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-07 10:40 +0200
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-07 09:15 +0200
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner cau.giacomo190@gmail.com - 2014-01-18 12:36 -0800
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner cau.giacomo190@gmail.com - 2014-03-02 12:16 -0800
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-03-03 21:27 +0000
Re: I finally found a technique to parse left-recursive grammar in an simple elegant manner "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2013-08-06 16:52 -0700
csiph-web