Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!uucp.gnuu.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <2671878.XpRBlBdN4Y@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:15:15 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.10.5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <67a00337-03f2-43d1-aaa3-ee26cf2488d6@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 44 NNTP-Posting-Date: 07 Aug 2013 09:15:18 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 0abf922c.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=Zf>iW9mMV Paste some experimental code I have written today, which verifies the > feasibility of my ideas. > coffeescript Language: > […] > Or maybe I made some mistakes in my ideas? I would appreciate you opinions > very much. You should post to a newsgroup where the people subscribed to it are more familiar with the programming language you are using, or at least interested in the language you are attempting to parse with it. In particular, how *exactly* does your posting relate to ECMAScript implementations? That CoffeeScript transcompiles to an ECMAScript implementation, that Brendan Eich says it has influenced his thinking about the future of JavaScript™ and ECMAScript, and that both CoffeeScript and J(ava)Script/ECMAScript have “script” in it, does not mean that CoffeeScript is on-topic here. CoffeeScript is not an ECMAScript implementation. Further reading: ISTM from just scanning your posting that it presents that general an approach that it belongs in newsgroup dealing with computer science in general instead, for proper review. Perhaps comp.compilers (moderated). However, Michael has pointed out that your proposal is lacking scientific research, so it may be better not to (re-)post it at all at this point. Also, you should post to Usenet using your real (transliterated) name (Cao Xingming?), and not via Google Groups’ (currently) borken or any other (current, therefore likely buggy) Web interface. For example, the more than 80 printable characters per line that Google Groups is producing by default are – with few exceptions – not appropriate here. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.