Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #382542
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation |
| Date | 2016-04-30 18:37 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2538497.1Wvl1r7yIa@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <nfgohr$feb$1@news.m-online.net> <bafe60da-7382-410f-8ec7-cb55b4b62eeb@googlegroups.com> <ng06do$3sv$1@news.m-online.net> <ng2j52$589$1@news.m-online.net> |
Fritz Lasinger wrote: > 5. The ratio of wave length λ to the distance x is konstant for all > Gravitons. > 6. The wave length λ so so long, that we cannot observe any wave > properties. See below, respectively. > 7. The lifetime of gravitons is very long, so we cannot > observe disappearance or disappearance. Inconsistent with its elaboration below. > 5: With λ=h/|p|=h/|mG*c| and mG=-G*m1*m2/(x*c^2) and m1=m2=mP (mP: > proton mass - ) we get > λ=h/|-G*mp^2/(x*c^2)*c)| or > λ/x=(h*c)/(G*mP^2)=(6.626E-34Js*2.998E8ms^-1)/(6.67E-11m^3kg^-1s^-2*(1.67E-27kg))≈1.1E39=const. Not even wrong. > 6: λ/x≈1.1E39: The wave length of the gravitons is so much larger than > the distans of the positive masses (for example protons), that one can > say, we cannot observe wave properties. Inconsistent with modern quantum mechanics which states that *every* particle exhibits wave properties; it can be described by a characteristic wavefunction that is a solution of the Schrödinger equation. > 7. The maximum flight distance before disappearing is r=c*∆t=h/(2*mG*c) > according to PointedEars 24.04.2016, 10:57. This is a gross misinterpretation of what I said there, and inconsistent with the summary above (if the particle can disappear after "flying" r(m), how can we not observe its disappearance?). I said instead that the (*one- way*) range of a force is limited by the (*rest*) mass of its virtual exchange particle. > If follows the ratio of maximum flight distance r to the distance of the > masses mP (assuming |mG| instead of mg): > r/x=(h*c)/(2*G*mP^2)=λ/(2x)≈0.5E39. > The flight distance is so much, that the gravitons can fly very very > often between two masses. Not even wrong. Score adjusted PointedEars -- Q: What did the nuclear physicist post on the laboratory door when he went camping? A: 'Gone fission'. (from: WolframAlpha
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-23 23:13 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-24 10:57 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-24 18:07 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 05:11 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 09:42 +0200
A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-24 09:48 -0700
A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-24 09:53 -0700
A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-24 09:59 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-26 11:07 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-26 20:52 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-26 12:15 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-26 15:49 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:07 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-27 00:37 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-27 07:33 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-27 07:55 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-27 08:11 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-27 08:35 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-27 08:48 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-27 10:07 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-27 13:09 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-28 07:27 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-28 08:11 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-28 13:37 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-28 15:27 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-28 17:01 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-28 22:08 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:18 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:38 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-29 08:50 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:10 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-29 09:30 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Waite <waitedavid1618@yahoo.com> - 2016-04-30 09:03 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-26 15:37 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-26 16:00 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 10:45 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-03 10:57 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:13 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-03 11:07 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-03 20:14 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-03 11:47 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-03 21:46 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation David Fuller <fuller.david@hotmail.com> - 2016-05-03 14:32 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation John Heath <heathjohn2@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 17:12 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 21:15 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-26 21:32 -0700
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-29 19:42 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 05:50 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-30 17:01 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 18:13 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-30 18:44 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-05-01 04:12 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Fritz Lasinger <las8@web.de> - 2016-04-30 17:31 +0200
Re: A new Momentum Theory for the Gravitation Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-04-30 18:37 +0200
csiph-web