Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #25735

[OT] Internet standards (was: call function for times with different types)

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject [OT] Internet standards (was: call function for times with different types)
Date 2014-08-26 18:22 +0200
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <2447277.PWrZg0qSN9@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <XnsA3955F56E2C50eejj99@194.109.133.133> <lthdt4$lhg$1@solani.org> <XnsA39567ABAFC29eejj99@194.109.133.133> <lthqqe$7gd$1@solani.org> <ltia64$omd$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Denis McMahon wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:25:05 +0200, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>> It seems you are referring to RFC 1036 section 2.1.1.  However, RFC 1036
>> is obsoleted by RFC 5536 and 5537, and RFC 5536 section 3.1.2 specifies:
> 
> I think you'll find that until RFCs 5536 and 5537 are actually standards,
> rather than 5 year old proposed standards, they don't obsolete 1036.

Your logic is flawed and your research method is lacking.

You will find that RFCs 5536, 5537, and 5322 are *Proposed* Standards and a 
*Draft* Standard, respectively – RFCs on the IETF Standards Track (not 
Internet standards yet; those have an STD number, too) –, and that, 
regardless of that, the former two *explicitly* obsolete RFC 1036 and the 
latter obsoletes RFC 2822.  As such, they bear the informal significance of 
“quasi-standard” or “de-facto standard” – something to be observed if one is 
to avoid interoperability problems.

It was about time in 2009, with the so-called “Son-of-RFC-1036” working 
draft being the implemented de-facto standard for Network News for the 
previous 9 years at least (it was the de-facto standard when I first used 
Usenet).

-- 
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

call function for times with different types 吳晞浩 <shwu.cs98@gmail.com> - 2014-08-25 22:59 -0700
  Re: call function for times with different types "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-08-26 09:22 +0200
    Re: call function for times with different types "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-08-26 09:44 +0200
      Re: call function for times with different types "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-08-26 10:11 +0200
        Re: call function for times with different types "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-08-26 13:25 +0200
          Re: call function for times with different types Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 17:25 +0200
            [OT] Chinese given names (was: call function for times with different types) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-27 01:40 +0200
          Re: call function for times with different types Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-08-26 15:47 +0000
            [OT] Internet standards (was: call function for times with different types) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 18:22 +0200
  Re: call function for times with different types Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 14:56 +0200
  Re: call function for times with different types Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-09-02 13:39 -0700

csiph-web