Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #25735
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | [OT] Internet standards (was: call function for times with different types) |
| Date | 2014-08-26 18:22 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <2447277.PWrZg0qSN9@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <XnsA3955F56E2C50eejj99@194.109.133.133> <lthdt4$lhg$1@solani.org> <XnsA39567ABAFC29eejj99@194.109.133.133> <lthqqe$7gd$1@solani.org> <ltia64$omd$1@dont-email.me> |
Denis McMahon wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:25:05 +0200, Christoph M. Becker wrote: >> It seems you are referring to RFC 1036 section 2.1.1. However, RFC 1036 >> is obsoleted by RFC 5536 and 5537, and RFC 5536 section 3.1.2 specifies: > > I think you'll find that until RFCs 5536 and 5537 are actually standards, > rather than 5 year old proposed standards, they don't obsolete 1036. Your logic is flawed and your research method is lacking. You will find that RFCs 5536, 5537, and 5322 are *Proposed* Standards and a *Draft* Standard, respectively – RFCs on the IETF Standards Track (not Internet standards yet; those have an STD number, too) –, and that, regardless of that, the former two *explicitly* obsolete RFC 1036 and the latter obsoletes RFC 2822. As such, they bear the informal significance of “quasi-standard” or “de-facto standard” – something to be observed if one is to avoid interoperability problems. It was about time in 2009, with the so-called “Son-of-RFC-1036” working draft being the implemented de-facto standard for Network News for the previous 9 years at least (it was the de-facto standard when I first used Usenet). -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
call function for times with different types 吳晞浩 <shwu.cs98@gmail.com> - 2014-08-25 22:59 -0700
Re: call function for times with different types "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-08-26 09:22 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-08-26 09:44 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2014-08-26 10:11 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-08-26 13:25 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 17:25 +0200
[OT] Chinese given names (was: call function for times with different types) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-27 01:40 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2014-08-26 15:47 +0000
[OT] Internet standards (was: call function for times with different types) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 18:22 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-08-26 14:56 +0200
Re: call function for times with different types Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2014-09-02 13:39 -0700
csiph-web