Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #36900
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Android 6 |
| Date | 2016-12-23 12:43 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <231220161243453968%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <qS5ERDaWuAXYFwnS@end.of.the.universe> <502c7829-0031-8959-8b94-88c12ed8f7dd@arnowelzel.de> <221220161915189668%nospam@nospam.invalid> <efd310f355.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com> |
In article <efd310f355.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com>, Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote: > >> If you really want to get as much "internal" memory as possible and do > >> backups regularly, then use the SD card as "internal". But since SD > >> cards are prone to errors as more you write on them > > > >complete nonsense. > > Nonsense on your part. It does happen, with some SD cards that > buyers believe to be perfectly respectable. I've had it happen > with three Kingston cards. there is no reason whatsoever why writing to an sd card or any other type of flash memory will cause it to slow down over time. that's absolute nonsense. whatever you think might have been happening was due to some other reason. one possibility is that volumes formatted as fat tend to be slower with a large number of files. perhaps that's what you're seeing. a simple reformat fixes that. > >> this > >> *may* not be a good idea if you don't have high quality SD cards. > > > >why would anyone buy a shit quality card? the good ones aren't that > >much more. > > The trouble /may/ be that there are fakes or substandard cards > out there, bought in good faith from an outlet that appears to > be respectable (my cards that I mentioned above were) - it would > not surprise me if respectable outlets are duped from time to > time and sell bad stuff in good faith. that isn't at all common and you know it, in the unlikely event it does happen, the respectable outlet will take it back and give you a legitimate one. > The world is not as black and white as you make it out to be. i never said it was.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 17:21 +0000
Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 10:00 -0800
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 00:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:30 -0500
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 12:42 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-12-23 11:58 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:43 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:33 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 08:59 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:20 +0100
Re: Android 6 AL <45364747@invalid.com> - 2017-01-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-05 01:34 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-07 14:14 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-07 13:09 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-08 18:18 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-08 15:42 -0500
Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:11 -0800
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:07 +0100
Re: Android 6 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-01-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-24 10:49 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-22 23:55 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:15 -0500
Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-23 05:46 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 00:15 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 17:11 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 12:43 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 21:22 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-24 14:29 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 11:10 +0000
Re: Android 6 Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> - 2016-12-25 12:37 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-25 11:18 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 20:28 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:45 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 18:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:24 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:04 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:11 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:23 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:39 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:26 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:11 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:12 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:24 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:30 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:42 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:44 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-17 17:47 +0000
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 01:05 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-02 02:08 -0500
Re: Android 6 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:01 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:51 -0500
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 20:41 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:18 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:14 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 14:05 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:46 +0100
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-31 20:18 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:47 +0100
csiph-web