Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.mobile.android > #36955

Re: Android 6

From Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk>
Newsgroups comp.mobile.android
Subject Re: Android 6
Date 2016-12-25 20:28 +0000
Organization Home
Message-ID <9d962af455.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <231220161243453968%nospam@nospam.invalid> <49d427f355.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com> <241220161429509971%nospam@nospam.invalid> <0d78f7f355.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com> <251220161118286891%nospam@nospam.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw

In message <251220161118286891%nospam@nospam.invalid>
          nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>In article <0d78f7f355.DaveMeUK@my.inbox.com>, Dave Higton
><dave@davehigton.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> >> Absolutely not - I was addressing the cards at sector level.
>> >
>> >that's not a normal use case.
>> >
>> >when using the card as intended, there is no slowdown. i have over ten
>> >year old sd cards and they work just as well now as they did when they
>> >were new.
>> 
>> Of course it's not a normal use case.  
>
>then it can be ignored.

You're denying reality again.

>> It gives incontrovertible
>> evidence that writing the sectors slowed down, in the case of the
>> three Kingston cards I had, after a period of use.  And it was
>> most, but not all, of the sectors that slowed down - some, at
>> lower addresses, remained fast.
>
>there's this thing called wear leveling.

Yes.  It happens transparently, so that an addressed sector is
replaced without the driving firmware or software knowing about
it.

>some sectors will ultimately slow down so much to not even be used
>anymore.

If you read what I said above, /most/ of the sectors of my Kingston
cards slowed down.  Under those conditions it's impossible for any
filing system not to slow down.

>> If writing the sectors slows down, it is inevitable that writing
>> within a filing system ("using the card as intended") must slow
>> down.
>
>except it doesn't. millions of people don't notice any slowdown at all.

Agreed.  It's also true that some people /do/ notice a slowdown.

Dave

Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 17:21 +0000
  Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 10:00 -0800
    Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 00:23 +0000
      Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:30 -0500
        Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 12:42 +0000
          Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-12-23 11:58 -0500
            Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:43 +0100
              Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:33 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 08:59 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:20 +0100
                Re: Android 6 AL <45364747@invalid.com> - 2017-01-04 10:06 -0700
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
                Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-05 01:34 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-07 14:14 +0000
                Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-07 13:09 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-08 18:18 +0000
                Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-08 15:42 -0500
                Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:11 -0800
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-08 20:19 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:07 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-01-08 21:34 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
          Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-24 10:49 +0100
  Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-22 23:55 +0100
    Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:15 -0500
      Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-23 05:46 +0100
        Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 00:15 -0500
      Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 17:11 +0000
        Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 12:43 -0500
          Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 21:22 +0000
            Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-24 14:29 -0500
              Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 11:10 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> - 2016-12-25 12:37 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-25 11:18 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 20:28 +0000
          Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
            Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:45 +0100
              Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 18:02 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:24 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:04 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:11 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:23 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:39 +0100
              Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:26 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:11 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:12 +0100
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:24 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:30 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:42 +0000
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:44 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-17 17:47 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 01:05 +0000
                Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-02 02:08 -0500
                Re: Android 6 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:01 +0000
                Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:51 -0500
                Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 20:41 +0000
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:18 +0100
                Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:14 +0100
          Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 14:05 +0100
      Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
        Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:46 +0100
          Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-31 20:18 +0000
      Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:47 +0100

csiph-web