Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #11902

Re: PEAR is dead?

Message-ID <2192648.T0CPNkHMSx@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2013-11-21 23:41 +0100
Subject Re: PEAR is dead?
Newsgroups comp.lang.php
References <pan.2013.11.21.21.15.10@gmail.com> <1542138.cOZVvEGFia@PointedEars.de> <pan.2013.11.21.22.20.08@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Mladen Gogala wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:54:53 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Have you visited the PEAR site lately?  If no, why not?
> 
> Yes, I have.

Have you found the section titled “Hot off the Press”?
 
>> If yes, why are you still asking?
> 
> Because the essential packages like PEAR itself and PHP_Beautifier
> haven't had any releases for quite some time.

pear/pear-core had the last update 5 days ago.  Also, OSS requires people 
who not only want to consume.


PointedEars
-- 
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
  -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk>

Back to comp.lang.php | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

PEAR is dead? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2013-11-21 21:15 +0000
  Re: PEAR is dead? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-21 22:54 +0100
  Re: PEAR is dead? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-21 22:54 +0100
    Re: PEAR is dead? Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> - 2013-11-21 22:20 +0000
      Re: PEAR is dead? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-21 23:41 +0100
        Re: PEAR is dead? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-21 23:50 +0100
          Re: PEAR is dead? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-22 00:27 +0100
            Re: PEAR is dead? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-11-22 12:15 +0100
        Re: PEAR is dead? Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-11-22 12:18 +0100
          Re: PEAR is dead? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-22 20:11 +0100
            Re: PEAR is dead? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-22 21:43 +0100
              Re: PEAR is dead? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-11-22 23:45 +0100
                Re: PEAR is dead? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-22 22:52 +0000
                Re: PEAR is dead? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-11-23 00:01 +0100
    Re: PEAR is dead? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-11-21 22:38 +0000

csiph-web