Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups!

From	lawcounsels@gmail.com
Newsgroups	comp.compression
Subject	Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups!
Date	2012-04-30 10:18 -0700
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<21356169.336.1335806325182.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuo17> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <66adcfb9-16c8-43b7-9033-7aaa36b5d5d7@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <d76fbe8d-26b2-4352-a47a-d8bdc855aca0@dc2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <ff529ab1-1b1e-46db-bd66-70c7e605a081@vy9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <12632577.1813.1335800097889.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxz8> <8d187163-1529-4461-8600-f2a9a9eb79ec@sm5g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, April 30, 2012 5:58:38 PM UTC+1, Fibonacci Code wrote:
> On Apr 30, 11:34 pm, lawcouns...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, April 30, 2012 3:36:33 PM UTC+1, Fibonacci Code wrote:
> >
> > > Any very high entropy binary file when chopped to ternary trits will
> > > have close distribution of 50 percent 0, 25 percent 10 , 25 percent
> > > 11.
> >
> > am awful busy at the moment hardly time to spare .... can you kindly 1st help quick clear simple explain how arbitrary choosing any # of bits from a random binary file will ALWAYS give 50%  '0'   25% '10'    25%  '11' ?
> >
> > ... to proceed then : )
> >
> > BTW : are you  or anyone here fluent with C#  & leading edge combinatorics ( 'multinomial' enumerative lexicocographic rank Index etc , or can easy quick pick up ) ... am looking for a few more high calibre 'confidential' co-researchers developers on this unprecedented immensely rewarding profit-shares .
> >
> > email your short details private  to LawCounsels at aol dot com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Where reverse Huffman apply 0-A, 10-B, 11-C
> >
> > > So this is what law mean turning a random file to biases probability.
> >
> > > He is now try to ask this room to compress the reverse Huffman
> > > probability,
> >
> > > An attempt to create recursive compression
> >
> > > 0101100010101111000001111
> > > 0
> > > 10
> > > 11
> >
> > > Well, 3 million usd was nothing to this kind of feat, well until now
> > > luckily,
> >
> > > No one found the solution yet,  include me !
> >
> > > it won't work dear, I did work on the same bias 7 years ago.
> >
> > > I do have a few close to jackpot algorithms, but still I had abandon
> > > them, the reason  is simple,
> >
> > > 50% 25% 25% is not precise and not constant for all the files you try
> > > to resolve.
> >
> > > The differences need entropy and thus overwrite the savings.
> >
> > > Regards,
> >
> > > Fibonacci
> 
> Not always, as I mentioned
> 
>  50% 25% 25% is not precise and not constant for all the files you try
> > to resolve.
> 
> It is very likely for high entropy file, eg densely packed.
> 
> So it won't work.
> 


Agrees ! it certainly will not work as you correct said on any very high entropy binary file chopped to ternary trits ( since very likely will
have close distribution of 50 percent 0, 25 percent 10 , 25 percent
11 ).....

IMPORTANT TO NOTE your very same high entropy binary file chopped to ternary trits above IS VERY COMPLETE DIFFERENT from the 'constraint' present in the US$3M data compression sequences NAMELY EACH SEQUENCE WHICH IS COMPRESSABLE ENDS WITH EXACT 2 MORE 'C's  THAN # OF 'B's  within each sequence [ this is complete different & absent from merely 50% '0'  25% '10'  25% '11' probabilities  ] 
 


> Cheers,
> 
> Fibonac

Thread

Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-03-31 10:32 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-03 11:32 +0200
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-03 09:07 -0700
      Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-06 01:24 -0700
        Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-08 00:41 -0700
          Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-08 04:25 -0700
            Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-08 22:58 -0700
              Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-09 04:19 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 09:03 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-10 02:29 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 05:43 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 06:39 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 06:51 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 07:29 -0700
                I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 09:03 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 09:56 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 10:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 10:54 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-11 13:16 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:10 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:57 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 08:38 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-13 02:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-30 07:36 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-30 08:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-30 18:53 +0200
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-30 09:58 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-30 10:18 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-10 05:58 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 07:26 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 08:10 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 11:02 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 02:43 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-11 02:47 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 02:56 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-11 16:26 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-11 07:36 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-11 10:29 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-12 02:27 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:08 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:34 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-13 13:48 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-13 05:15 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 06:57 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 07:03 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 06:52 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-14 00:54 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-16 02:48 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-16 13:08 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-16 04:40 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-16 08:11 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-16 19:31 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-16 14:27 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 03:46 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 07:27 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-28 09:55 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-16 02:34 -0700
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 00:35 -0700
      Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 00:38 -0700
        Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 04:06 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Ernst <Ernst_Berg@sbcglobal.net> - 2012-04-06 19:48 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-07 02:28 -0700
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-07 03:22 -0700

csiph-web