Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.compression > #1259

Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles

From lawcounsels@gmail.com
Newsgroups comp.compression
Subject Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles
Date 2012-04-16 04:40 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <26116594.80.1334576446764.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuc18> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <jm93ql$qs8$1@news.belwue.de> <13813442.8.1334325155598.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuy10> <jmaaqe$ecr$1@news.belwue.de> <bb28a0dd-3f33-46a8-90c0-c0d5b1c04cf6@b14g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <jmgujl$2ut$1@news.belwue.de>

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, April 16, 2012 12:08:45 PM UTC+1, Thomas Richter wrote:
> On 16.04.2012 11:48, LawCounsels wrote:
> 
> > YES TRUE in the above MQ case
> >
> > However here would already be failing badly real 'desperate' if solver
> > here needs ever resort to
> > possible but 'far far too small' potential savings from this AC
> > truncations which in all cases further
> > diminishes to insignificant when N ->  arbitrary large size [&  only if
> > AC is the solution method
> > depended on ... ] .... would be better here not to be needless
> > distracted by non-essential details
> 
> No, its savings are of the same magnitude as the savings you get from 
> requiring that the sequence is 513 bits long. N is not infinity here, 
> unless you changed the problem again. If N goes to infinity, there are 
> no savings from the truncation condition, neither from the c = b + 2 
> condition. This condition only provides "split points", but these do not 
> matter for an infinite number of sequences.
> 
> So, now what? Will you provide a better problem desciption - the current 
> description is not sufficient.

solutions to the Data Compression REWARDS as already stated ( without any subsequent further fine details needed ) does not require any of the possible but 'far far too small'  potential savings AC truncations savings if further now imposes limits each sequence length to 513 bits  , to attain Net 0.08 bits or more compressions savings

.... the couple 'certain' solutions put forth so far now to be tested developed to confirm has not made use of AC at all

think the Data Compression REWARDS as stated best SIMPLEST be just left as is intact 

[ however , I should also leave to anyone attempting a winning solution to 'as of right' if he so chooses , to assume each sequence can be of at most 513 bits long ... if this helps his solution strategy  ]

Back to comp.compression | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-03-31 10:32 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-03 11:32 +0200
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-03 09:07 -0700
      Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-06 01:24 -0700
        Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-08 00:41 -0700
          Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-08 04:25 -0700
            Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-08 22:58 -0700
              Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-09 04:19 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-09 09:03 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-10 02:29 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 05:43 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 06:39 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 06:51 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 07:29 -0700
                I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 09:03 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 09:56 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-10 10:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-10 10:54 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-11 13:16 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:10 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:57 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 08:38 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-13 02:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-30 07:36 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-30 08:34 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-30 18:53 +0200
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-30 09:58 -0700
                Re: I knew I was going to dislike New Google Groups! lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-30 10:18 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-10 05:58 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 07:26 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 08:10 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles biject <biject.bwts@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 11:02 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 02:43 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-11 02:47 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 02:56 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-11 16:26 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-11 07:36 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-11 10:29 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-12 02:27 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:08 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-12 03:34 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-13 13:48 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-13 05:15 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 06:57 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 07:03 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-13 06:52 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-14 00:54 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-16 02:48 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-16 13:08 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-16 04:40 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-16 08:11 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-04-16 19:31 +0200
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-16 14:27 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 03:46 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Jim Leonard <mobygamer@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 07:27 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Fibonacci Code <anglikai@gmail.com> - 2012-04-28 09:55 -0700
                Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels <lawcounsels@gmail.com> - 2012-04-16 02:34 -0700
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 00:35 -0700
      Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 00:38 -0700
        Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-04 04:06 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles Ernst <Ernst_Berg@sbcglobal.net> - 2012-04-06 19:48 -0700
  Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles LawCounsels@aol.com - 2012-04-07 02:28 -0700
    Re: Mankind's centuries old Kraft's Inequality / Pigeonholes hurdles lawcounsels@gmail.com - 2012-04-07 03:22 -0700

csiph-web