Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10655
| Message-ID | <2126129.poPQLBhg8N@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-01-27 19:09 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT] On- and off-topic postings (was: Strecthed Fonts) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (11 earlier) <O6udnbVTZtkBILzSnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <1668914.JFYEL58v44@PointedEars.de> <e73641d3-85d7-4442-a05e-0b081efcb184@k28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <1904609.vT6jbplMrv@PointedEars.de> <24aee67a-dcf7-4f09-b84d-682578cd7553@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| Followup-To | poster |
Followups directed to: poster
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Name one. I am not aware of any recently. Of course, I am not reading
>> most messages coming from Google Groups, thanks to its intrinsically bad
>> S/N ratio.
>
> "FAQ Topic - How can I create a Date object from a String?
> (2011-02-15) "
>
> Just look at how many of those messages actually have something to do
> with Dates at all. Sure, its related to JavaScript, but I wouldn't
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> count that towards relevance really since the relationship to the OP
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> is stretched. There are many threads that end up like this.
You have a misconception there. A posting or a part of a posting is called
"off-topic" if it does not relate to the topic of the *newsgroup* at all.
The topic of a newsgroup is described in the newsgroup's charter and
tagline, but is actually defined implicitly by the regularly active
participants of the newsgroup (regulars) through their use. As such, it may
gradually change over time, as it is the case with comp.lang.javascript:
Even though charter and tagline says that Netscape JavaScript is the topic,
we are already discussing other ECMAScript implementations than
JavaScript[tm] and common applications of these programming languages like
DOM scripting here by now. (And that is good so. However, it would also be
a good idea if the charter and tagline would be updated accordingly.)
What you are describing above is called "thread drift" instead, which is
usual and healthy for Network News and, I daresay, any electronic discussion
medium. Keep in mind that this is _not_ a support forum.
HTH
F'up2 PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 15:47 +1100
Re: allow blocked content Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-24 12:45 +0100
Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 07:32 +1100
Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-24 15:00 -0800
Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 13:56 +1100
Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-25 04:11 +0100
Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 15:27 +1100
Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 23:08 +1100
Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 09:23 -0800
Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 14:49 +1100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 20:17 -0800
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 07:54 +1100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 01:31 +0100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 19:46 -0800
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 14:08 +0100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-27 08:33 -0800
[OT] On- and off-topic postings (was: Strecthed Fonts) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 19:09 +0100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 18:37 +0000
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:38 -0800
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 14:19 +1100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 19:43 -0800
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-28 10:30 +0100
Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 07:58 +1100
Re: allow blocked content Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-25 19:49 +0000
csiph-web