Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10655

[OT] On- and off-topic postings (was: Strecthed Fonts)

Message-ID <2126129.poPQLBhg8N@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Date 2012-01-27 19:09 +0100
Subject [OT] On- and off-topic postings (was: Strecthed Fonts)
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
References (11 earlier) <O6udnbVTZtkBILzSnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <1668914.JFYEL58v44@PointedEars.de> <e73641d3-85d7-4442-a05e-0b081efcb184@k28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <1904609.vT6jbplMrv@PointedEars.de> <24aee67a-dcf7-4f09-b84d-682578cd7553@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Followup-To poster

Followups directed to: poster

Show all headers | View raw


Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Name one.  I am not aware of any recently.  Of course, I am not reading
>> most messages coming from Google Groups, thanks to its intrinsically bad
>> S/N ratio.
> 
> "FAQ Topic - How can I create a Date object from a String?
> (2011-02-15) "
> 
> Just look at how many of those messages actually have something to do
> with Dates at all. Sure, its related to JavaScript, but I wouldn't
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> count that towards relevance really since the relationship to the OP
                                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> is stretched. There are many threads that end up like this.

You have a misconception there.  A posting or a part of a posting is called 
"off-topic" if it does not relate to the topic of the *newsgroup* at all.

The topic of a newsgroup is described in the newsgroup's charter and 
tagline, but is actually defined implicitly by the regularly active 
participants of the newsgroup (regulars) through their use.  As such, it may 
gradually change over time, as it is the case with comp.lang.javascript: 
Even though charter and tagline says that Netscape JavaScript is the topic, 
we are already discussing other ECMAScript implementations than 
JavaScript[tm] and common applications of these programming languages like 
DOM scripting here by now.  (And that is good so.  However, it would also be 
a good idea if the charter and tagline would be updated accordingly.)

What you are describing above is called "thread drift" instead, which is 
usual and healthy for Network News and, I daresay, any electronic discussion 
medium.  Keep in mind that this is _not_ a support forum.


HTH

F'up2 PointedEars
-- 
    realism:    HTML 4.01 Strict
    evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
    madness:    XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
                                                    -- Bjoern Hoehrmann

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 15:47 +1100
  Re: allow blocked content Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-24 12:45 +0100
    Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 07:32 +1100
      Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-24 15:00 -0800
        Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 13:56 +1100
          Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-25 04:11 +0100
            Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 15:27 +1100
              Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-25 23:08 +1100
                Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 09:23 -0800
                Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-26 14:49 +1100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 20:17 -0800
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 07:54 +1100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 01:31 +0100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 19:46 -0800
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 14:08 +0100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-27 08:33 -0800
                [OT] On- and off-topic postings (was: Strecthed Fonts) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 19:09 +0100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 18:37 +0000
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:38 -0800
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-27 14:19 +1100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 19:43 -0800
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2012-01-28 10:30 +0100
                Re: Strecthed Fonts Was: Re: allow blocked content Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-29 07:58 +1100
    Re: allow blocked content Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-25 19:49 +0000

csiph-web