Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #15849
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Chuck gets an iphone |
| Date | 2012-10-01 17:31 +0200 |
| Organization | 1&1 Internet AG |
| Message-ID | <2050135.4G8SNSFffr@sunwukong.fritz.box> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <5068c412$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <3ab2448c-8aab-4773-9b0b-dc9ab78db60d@p22g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <7x626usj9m.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <b25eb004-462d-401f-9eec-8c5366e87d46@m4g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <7xtxuecj20.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
Paul Rubin wrote: > Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> writes: >> Even so, I think an Android phone is much more suitable for a >> 'hacker' type (in the old meaning of the word) like Chuck. The Apple >> is a very neat *consumer* device. Brilliant. But hackers, I imagine, >> would find the Android platform more hackable. > > Android doesn't seem like that much of an improvement; one should not > have to "root" (break security) on a "hacker's" phone in order to > program it. You don't have to "root" an Android phone to program it yourself. All you need is to tick a checkmark in the settings. I rooted my Android devices for rather the opposit of "breaking security". Tools like LBE privacy protection allow much better control of what apps can do (like reading my contacts), but they require root privilege to do so. The rooting procedure consists of installing su and budybox; su is an app that grants apps root privilege when they request it *and* the user allows that. A rooted Android is typically more secure than a non-rooted one, due to add-ons that help to protect security, but won't work on non-rooted systems. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Chuck gets an iphone Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-27 16:46 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone jacko <jackokring@gmail.com> - 2012-09-28 10:57 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 09:28 -0400
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-09-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-09-30 18:13 -0400
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 00:49 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-01 01:12 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 02:05 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-01 08:23 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-10-01 17:31 +0200
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2012-10-01 09:05 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-10-01 18:52 +0200
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-10-01 09:10 -0700
Re: Chuck gets an iphone vandys@vsta.org - 2012-10-02 15:52 +0000
Re: Chuck gets an iphone Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-10-02 22:34 +0200
Re: Chuck gets an iphone rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2012-10-02 18:09 -0400
csiph-web