Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > news.groups.proposals > #3896
| From | Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | news.groups.proposals, comp.lang.c++, comp.lang.c, comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? |
| Date | 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250310114140.525@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 2025-03-10, Dan Cross <cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net> wrote: > [Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals] > > I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a > new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust > programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Grownups interested in Rust should have a place for discussing it in which "anything goes", and Usenet is the best forum in the world for that. Now, I strongly suspect that a Rust newsgroup will be ignored by pretty much the entire current Rust demographic---but it doesn't matter. Usenet has no security. People can use fake identies easily. The authenticty of next to nothing can be ascertained. It's not a "safe" environment. Anyone can say anything. You cannot enforce anything resembling a code of conduct. Core Rust development discussions (the sane people) are certainly not going to move to Usenet, where they cannot enforce their rules. Most of the remaining demographic clustered around Rust cannot wrap their heads around that something like Usenet is even allowed to exist. It mainly consists of paranoid, security-obsessed freaks who are running from something, and includes a surprising number of social activists. A Rust forum repugnant to them could foster alterantive narratives. It would be a benefit to Rust, even if in all likelihood small. -- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca
Back to news.groups.proposals | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 07:46 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 08:43 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-13 14:49 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-13 15:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-14 14:11 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-14 18:06 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? NewsGroups Are Dead <noreply@invalid.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-11 08:12 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-11 16:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.org.invalid> - 2025-03-13 14:50 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org> - 2025-03-14 16:30 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Tristan Miller <tmiller@big-8.org> - 2025-03-14 16:20 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-14 17:32 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-10 17:35 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-04-09 20:49 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Steve Bonine <spb@pobox.com> - 2025-04-10 19:53 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? rek2 hispagatos <rek2@hispagatos.meow.org.invalid> - 2025-04-11 09:34 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 23:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Beej Jorgensen <beej@beej.us> - 2025-03-11 16:54 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Kragen Javier Sitaker <kragen@canonical.org> - 2026-08-28 18:58 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2026-08-29 04:46 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-08-29 14:14 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-08-30 16:20 -0400
Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? noel <deletethis@invalid.lan> - 2026-08-30 16:20 -0400
Re: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? ReK2 Hispagatos <rek2@usenet_reborn.tui> - 2026-08-31 13:30 -0400
csiph-web