Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #118550
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++ |
| Subject | Re: Idea for spin-wait loops |
| Date | 2024-03-25 19:11 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20240325201122.000031d6@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | <utn1eh$3oeks$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <utnff2$3rn1f$1@dont-email.me> <Zf0MN.450378$yEgf.411259@fx09.iad> <20240325153450.000019cf@yahoo.com> |
On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 14:34:50 +0200 Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 20:43:37 GMT > scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote: > > > "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> writes: > > >On 3/23/2024 9:53 AM, Bonita Montero wrote: > > >> I've got a nice idea for a new processor-extrension for spin-wait > > >> -loops. The idea is that a thread of a processors enters a sleep > > >> state if a word in memory is equal to a certain register until > > >> > > > > A processor which is doesn't own (or have a shared copy) of the > > cacheline which would contain that word in memory will never know > > if it was modified, as it won't see the invalidate messages in > > a directory-based cache subsystem (leaving aside noncachable > > accesses to the word in memory, of course). > > > > It seems, I didn't understand the idea. I meant to say 'you' instead of 'I'.
Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-23 17:53 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-23 13:52 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-23 13:58 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-24 07:38 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-25 19:48 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 11:12 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 13:02 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 21:23 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 13:30 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 13:31 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 10:18 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-03-27 17:09 +0200
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-27 12:58 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-24 07:37 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-24 12:33 -0700
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2024-03-24 20:43 +0000
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-25 07:23 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-03-25 14:34 +0200
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2024-03-25 19:11 +0200
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-03-25 18:53 +0100
Re: Idea for spin-wait loops "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-03-26 13:13 -0700
csiph-web