Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.os.linux > #52712

Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:47:16 -0000 (UTC)
Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:

> Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:45:06 -0000 (UTC)
> > Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> wrote:
> >  
> >> William Unruh wrote:  
> >> > On 2019-01-17, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:    
> >> >> On 2019-01-16, arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> wrote:
> >> >>    
> >> >>> We're going to have far shorter discussions, moving
> >> >>> forward.    
> >> >>
> >> >> If the goal is shorer discussions you're wasting words. 
> >> >> Other then length what does "moving forward" add to the
> >> >> sentence?    
> >> >
> >> > It gives the lie to the rest of the sentence.    
> >> 
> >> (stripped out everyone else, I think we're all a.o.l people here
> >> anyway)
> >> 
> >> There has to be a defined term for this somewhere, proving there's
> >> a logical fallacy in arlen's statement.
> >>   
> > "Logically, grammatically, and factually incorrect?"  
> 
> Well, yeah, but I mean something like "begging the question" or
> something.  Although 'ad hominem' is definitely a favorite of his.

OK, then, where's my list...
 
Often he's guilty of a false dichotomy, or refusing to acknowledge
alternate views.  ...may apply.

Regularly he's guilty of a repetition fallacy, but not, I think, here.

Often he's guilty of a strawman argument by trying to move off-point.
...maybe this applies.

Of course, his first reply to Jolly Rodger was an ad hominem wherein he
attacked the person, not the argument.

He tried dismissing Jolly's argument with no proof, thereby appealing
to the stone.

Assuming his premise to be automatically correct, he is almost always
begging the question.

He snips facts that don't support his argument and that's cherry
picking.

When he offers no supporting evidence he is using circular logic.

He so wants his assertions to be true but that doesn't mean they are.
That's known as a divine fallacy.

DANG, it looks like he uses almost the entire list of fallacious
arguments in his posts.

Cybe R. Wizard -thinks Ben was describing Arler Holden here:
-- 
"Your argument is sound.  Nothing but sound."
	Ben (Jammin') Franklin

Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-01-17 06:59 +0000
  Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:21 -0600
    Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-17 23:14 +0000
      Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale arlen holder <arlen@arlen.com> - 2019-01-18 05:24 +0000
        Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2019-01-21 04:51 +0000
  Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-17 11:45 +0000
    Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 07:03 -0600
      Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-17 13:47 +0000
        Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 08:52 -0600
          Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-01-17 14:58 +0000
            Re: I just belatedly realized why adults can't communicate with Jolly Roger & nospam & Alan Baker & Snit - because they're too far to the left on the Dunning-Kruger scale "Cybe R. Wizard" <cybe_r_wizard@WizardsTower.invalid> - 2019-01-17 09:08 -0600

csiph-web