Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #110275
| From | GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Some ideas about c? |
| Date | 2017-05-18 15:20 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20170518152058.2310bbef4001d8337902cf6a@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <2b7a936d-13df-442c-857e-3f1c3334acbc@googlegroups.com> <20170518123645.5a5e48fc82f88306ab7cc2d8@gmail.com> <b60ad203-d947-4324-8232-9f0d2f5a2849@googlegroups.com> <20170518142401.af13a798b2709c7fc5a3248f@gmail.com> <ofk4bt$uad$1@jstuckle.eternal-september.org> |
On Thu, 18 May 2017 08:37:41 -0400 Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote: > No, STL is like any other library - including the standard C libraries. > It is there so that people don't have to keep rewriting the same code > over and over again. Wrong. The STL is by definition standard, thus any C++ implementation is forced to provide the STL that's why C++ is so much bloated. > You could also code a more optimized version of printf() every time you > need to output something. Or more efficient versions of malloc() and > free() for your specific memory allocation needs. But do you? Whenever I use printf() or any kind of predefined function, it is only because it fit my requirements. If I need a better elaborated function, I write my own. > I would say every serious C programmer needs floating point numbers and > string utilities at some point. Complex type, not so much. Do you suggest C programmers on limited hardware aren't serious? ... > There are lots of special purpose libraries I find handy but don't need > to necessarily be part of the standard. IMHO GTK+ falls into that category. IMHO the C standard library too.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Some ideas about c? Vassilis Spiliopoulos <vassilis@vask1lux.de> - 2017-05-17 23:23 +0300
Re: Some ideas about c? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-18 08:40 +1200
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 23:00 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-17 14:59 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 00:08 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-17 22:09 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-18 18:22 +1200
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 12:36 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 03:53 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 14:24 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 08:37 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 05:47 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 15:20 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 06:28 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-18 13:56 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 16:30 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 07:45 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-18 16:08 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 08:15 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 11:46 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? Vassilis Spiliopoulos <vassilis@vask1lux.de> - 2017-05-18 21:33 +0300
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 15:29 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 01:23 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 18:12 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 10:08 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 00:39 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Vassilis Spiliopoulos <vassilis@vask1lux.de> - 2017-05-19 14:27 +0300
Re: Some ideas about c? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-05-19 13:41 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-19 13:04 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 10:00 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? GOTHIER Nathan <nathan.gothier@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 14:14 +0200
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 11:33 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 08:47 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-18 08:48 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 09:02 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 15:35 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-18 14:01 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 17:38 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-18 15:54 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2017-05-18 22:17 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 08:06 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 09:17 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 14:34 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Vassilis Spiliopoulos <vassilis@vask1lux.de> - 2017-05-18 16:16 +0300
Re: Some ideas about c? Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-18 10:26 -0300
Re: Some ideas about c? John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 07:36 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 21:51 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-19 12:38 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? supercat@casperkitty.com - 2017-05-19 07:44 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-19 16:45 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2017-05-19 21:59 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 10:06 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-19 18:18 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 11:59 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2017-05-19 21:05 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2017-05-19 12:42 -0400
Re: Some ideas about c? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-05-19 17:54 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 18:52 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 18:51 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-19 18:55 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 19:58 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 12:12 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 12:01 -0700
Re: Some ideas about c? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2017-05-19 08:22 +1200
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 21:53 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-19 12:36 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 18:54 +0100
Re: Some ideas about c? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2017-05-19 18:58 +0000
Re: Some ideas about c? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2017-05-19 12:18 -0700
csiph-web