Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352805
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: test failed |
| Date | 2016-04-30 05:43 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20160430054333.1161dc8a@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | <ghjdje902.ar@rooftop.invalid> |
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 03:42:01 +0000 (UTC) owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > No match on hash. > Will try one more test with appended newline, in the event that > the ip was just echo'ed through md5sum with a newline: > > anon@lowtide:~$ echo 10.0.0.1 | md5sum > 81a69697c964052ffd235c28166ba917 - > anon@lowtide:~$ > > vs. > > anon@lowtide:~$ echo -n 10.0.0.1 | md5sum > 190dafab69706a67221c1226360de7dc - > anon@lowtide:~$ > > If this doesn't get a match, it may not be an ipv4 ip, despite > this eternal-september Injection-Info header looking almost > identical to a google-groups header where the "posting-host" > substring *is* an ipv4 address. The only format difference > is that the hash is surrounded by double quotes in the > eternal-september string, whereas there are no quotes around > the ip in the google-groups string. > > Anyway, I made modifications to the code to account for a > possible newline being encoded. I'll run a couple more tests > with the original, then start over with the new code. > > Do you think they are that stupid to just hash ip address?
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:42 +0000
Re: test failed Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:43 +0200
Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:51 +0000
Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:53 +0000
Re: test failed Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:41 -0700
csiph-web