Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352805

Re: test failed

From Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: test failed
Date 2016-04-30 05:43 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <20160430054333.1161dc8a@maxa-pc> (permalink)
References <ghjdje902.ar@rooftop.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 03:42:01 +0000 (UTC)
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> No match on hash.
> Will try one more test with appended newline, in the event that
> the ip was just echo'ed through md5sum with a newline:
> 
> anon@lowtide:~$ echo 10.0.0.1 | md5sum
> 81a69697c964052ffd235c28166ba917  -
> anon@lowtide:~$ 
> 
> vs.
> 
> anon@lowtide:~$ echo -n 10.0.0.1 | md5sum
> 190dafab69706a67221c1226360de7dc  -
> anon@lowtide:~$
> 
> If this doesn't get a match, it may not be an ipv4 ip, despite
> this eternal-september Injection-Info header looking almost
> identical to a google-groups header where the "posting-host"
> substring *is* an ipv4 address.  The only format difference
> is that the hash is surrounded by double quotes in the
> eternal-september string, whereas there are no quotes around
> the ip in the google-groups string.
> 
> Anyway, I made modifications to the code to account for a
> possible newline being encoded.  I'll run a couple more tests
> with the original, then start over with the new code.
> 
> 

Do you think they are that stupid to just hash ip address?

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:42 +0000
  Re: test failed Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:43 +0200
    Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:51 +0000
  Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:53 +0000
    Re: test failed Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:41 -0700

csiph-web