Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352808

Re: test failed

Show all headers | View raw

Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 03:42:01 +0000 (UTC)
> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> No match on hash.
>> Will try one more test with appended newline, in the event that
>> the ip was just echo'ed through md5sum with a newline:
>> 
>> anon@lowtide:~$ echo 10.0.0.1 | md5sum
>> 81a69697c964052ffd235c28166ba917  -
>> anon@lowtide:~$ 
>> 
>> vs.
>> 
>> anon@lowtide:~$ echo -n 10.0.0.1 | md5sum
>> 190dafab69706a67221c1226360de7dc  -
>> anon@lowtide:~$
>> 
>> If this doesn't get a match, it may not be an ipv4 ip, despite
>> this eternal-september Injection-Info header looking almost
>> identical to a google-groups header where the "posting-host"
>> substring *is* an ipv4 address.  The only format difference
>> is that the hash is surrounded by double quotes in the
>> eternal-september string, whereas there are no quotes around
>> the ip in the google-groups string.
>> 
>> Anyway, I made modifications to the code to account for a
>> possible newline being encoded.  I'll run a couple more tests
>> with the original, then start over with the new code.
>> 
>> 
> 
> Do you think they are that stupid to just hash ip address?

Maybe.  Only one way to find out.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:42 +0000
  Re: test failed Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:43 +0200
    Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:51 +0000
  Re: test failed owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:53 +0000
    Re: test failed Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:41 -0700

csiph-web