Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison?

From	Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>
Newsgroups	comp.sys.mac.apps
Date	2015-04-06 16:29 -0700
Message-ID	<2015040616292071550-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <mfu8hp$uho$1@dont-email.me> <2015040609171487269-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> <mfuk1r$eb2$1@dont-email.me> <2015040614071787422-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> <2015040616040375409-xxx@yyyzzz>
Subject	Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison?

Show all headers | View raw

On 2015-04-06 23:04:03 +0000, gtr said:

> On 2015-04-06 21:07:17 +0000, Savageduck said:
>> On 2015-04-06 18:42:03 +0000, sctvguy1 said:
>>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:17:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote:
>>>> On 2015-04-06 15:25:45 +0000, sctvguy1 said:
>>>>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 23:35:09 -0700, gtr wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-04-06 05:00:07 +0000, sctvguy1 said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just got my new(to me) iMac, and my old G4 Thoth is not capable of
>>>>>>> running on an Intel machine(even if I could get a new version from
>>>>>>> Brian Clark).
>>>>>>> Have been seeing all the hoopla about Unison 2.2 and all the bitching
>>>>>>> and moaning.  Is it that bad?  Is it really OK?  What's the deal?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It's broken in various ways: Crashes, locks up.  Get Unison 2.1.10
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would it be free with a registration number?  Panic said on their
>>>>> website that 2.2 is free with no registration number required.
>>>> 
>>>> It is a total freebee.
>>>> All the releases are available: <http://download.panic.com/unison/>
>>> 
>>> So, will ALL the releases have a free registration number?  Will the one
>>> provided by Panic work with even the older releases?
>> 
>> I certainly had registration numbers for both U1 & U2, but the current 
>> distribution of the dead Panic catalog does not require registration, 
>> there is no support, and there will not be any updates or fixes. 
>> Perhaps they might get the wild idea to resurrect it sometime in the 
>> future, but I can't see that happening any time soon. So, download the 
>> version(s) of your choice and see which works best for you. Try 1.8.1, 
>> 2.1.10, & 2.2. My preference lies with 1.8.1.
>> 
>> 
>> Personnally I would
> 
> I would too!

Sigh... I guess I hit that send button prematurely. :-(

What I intended to say was; "Personally, I would opt for 1.8.1 before 2.2."


-- 
Regards,

Savageduck

Thread

Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 05:00 +0000
  Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-05 23:19 -0700
  Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-05 23:35 -0700
    Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:25 +0000
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:39 -0400
        Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:58 +0000
          Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 15:51 -0400
            Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Doc O'Leary  <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-04-07 02:38 +0000
          Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 09:45 -0400
            Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-07 14:35 +0000
              Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 12:09 -0400
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 09:17 -0700
        Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 18:42 +0000
          Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 14:07 -0700
            Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 16:04 -0700
              Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 16:29 -0700
                Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 17:23 -0700
  Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2015-04-06 05:12 -0700
    Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:19 -0400
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:27 +0000
        Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 09:41 -0700
          Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2015-04-06 18:55 +0100
            Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 16:05 -0700
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 09:11 -0700
  Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:17 -0400
    Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:27 +0000
    Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2015-04-06 16:07 +0000
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 09:43 -0700
      Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Robert Grimes <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-21 00:44 -0500
        Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-21 05:50 +0000

csiph-web