Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #28621
| From | Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.apps |
| Date | 2015-04-06 14:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2015040614071787422-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mft3sn$aj9$2@dont-email.me> <2015040523350912733-xxx@yyyzzz> <mfu8hp$uho$1@dont-email.me> <2015040609171487269-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMme.com> <mfuk1r$eb2$1@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? |
On 2015-04-06 18:42:03 +0000, sctvguy1 said: > On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 09:17:14 -0700, Savageduck wrote: > >> On 2015-04-06 15:25:45 +0000, sctvguy1 said: >> >>> On Sun, 05 Apr 2015 23:35:09 -0700, gtr wrote: >>> >>>> On 2015-04-06 05:00:07 +0000, sctvguy1 said: >>>> >>>>> Just got my new(to me) iMac, and my old G4 Thoth is not capable of >>>>> running on an Intel machine(even if I could get a new version from >>>>> Brian Clark). >>>>> Have been seeing all the hoopla about Unison 2.2 and all the bitching >>>>> and moaning. Is it that bad? Is it really OK? What's the deal? >>>> >>>> It's broken in various ways: Crashes, locks up. Get Unison 2.1.10 >>> >>> Would it be free with a registration number? Panic said on their >>> website that 2.2 is free with no registration number required. >> >> It is a total freebee. >> All the releases are available: <http://download.panic.com/unison/> > > So, will ALL the releases have a free registration number? Will the one > provided by Panic work with even the older releases? I certainly had registration numbers for both U1 & U2, but the current distribution of the dead Panic catalog does not require registration, there is no support, and there will not be any updates or fixes. Perhaps they might get the wild idea to resurrect it sometime in the future, but I can't see that happening any time soon. So, download the version(s) of your choice and see which works best for you. Try 1.8.1, 2.1.10, & 2.2. My preference lies with 1.8.1. Personnally I would -- Regards, Savageduck
Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 05:00 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-05 23:19 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-05 23:35 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:25 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:39 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:58 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 15:51 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Doc O'Leary <droleary@2usenet2014.subsume.com> - 2015-04-07 02:38 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 09:45 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-07 14:35 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 12:09 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 09:17 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 18:42 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 14:07 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 16:04 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 16:29 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 17:23 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2015-04-06 05:12 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:19 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:27 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 09:41 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Calum <com.gmail@nospam.scottishwildcat> - 2015-04-06 18:55 +0100
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 16:05 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2015-04-06 09:11 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Alan Browne <alan.browne@freelunchvideotron.ca> - 2015-04-06 11:17 -0400
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? sctvguy1 <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-06 15:27 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2015-04-06 16:07 +0000
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2015-04-06 09:43 -0700
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Robert Grimes <sctvguy1@invalid.net> - 2015-04-21 00:44 -0500
Re: Should I go ahead and get the last Unison? Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-21 05:50 +0000
csiph-web