Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #37882

Re: Rockwell R65F11

Date 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
From Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Rockwell R65F11
Message-ID <20150403121645.6705fc14@T60A> (permalink)
References <5219ce4c-5c04-4901-945e-c5df59a12bb6@googlegroups.com> <b9a5ab53-0046-4757-817b-761ec8e1db1d@googlegroups.com> <6666f49c-5282-445f-8098-b56aa9c9d225@googlegroups.com> <20150402102012.66a1452d@T60A> <551d2736$0$3060$e4fe514c@dreader35.news.xs4all.nl>

Show all headers | View raw


On 02 Apr 2015 11:25:42 GMT
albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) wrote:

> In article <20150402102012.66a1452d@T60A>,
> Jan Coombs  <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com> wrote:
   . . .
> >
> >I think it would be great to have the python byte code engine
> >written in Forth.  Like Forth, python functions can return
> >multiple items, and source code looks clean and simple.
> 
> That part is easy. The difficult part is where performance matters.
> There the {ythoneers have their libraries written in C.
> A graphics library, or a serial communication library working
> transparently the same on several OS-es are the problem.
> Replacing C as an implementation language for e.g. tcl is
> something not even major Forth implementors aspire to.

Agreed, but if you had a Forth chip, and wanted to sell it to 
a wide audience, then Python might make it look more attractive, 
and then you'd be doing the os/system code in Forth, not C. 

 
> >When can we start?
> 
> With what, a proof-of-concept Python interpreter in Forth, like
> we have a Pascal compiler and a BASIC interpreter?

Yes, "Build one to throw away", especially if it's worth it. Also, 
your toy might be my inspirational start point. 


Jan Coombs.
-- 
email valid, else fix dots and hyphen
jan4clf2014@murrayhyphenmicroftdotcodotuk

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 15:52 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 23:46 +0000
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 17:24 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 17:33 -0700
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-24 21:44 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-25 14:47 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 18:42 -0400
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:43 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 20:08 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-25 21:41 -0700
          Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-25 22:43 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 11:42 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-26 20:50 +0000
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 18:07 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 13:11 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 21:11 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 22:14 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-28 16:57 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-28 17:18 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 11:05 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-02 10:20 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-02 11:25 +0000
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 09:23 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-06 10:51 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:55 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-07 20:18 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-07 19:02 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 16:10 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:57 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 00:06 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-03 09:00 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-08 08:27 +0100
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 12:22 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-24 13:38 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 08:35 -0700

csiph-web