Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #37829

Re: Rockwell R65F11

Date 2015-04-02 10:20 +0100
From Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>>
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Rockwell R65F11
Message-ID <20150402102012.66a1452d@T60A> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <61a5e345-410c-418e-89ab-65fd967ee69b@googlegroups.com> <737e3f72-50c0-4a06-b43f-056b3f2ac38b@googlegroups.com> <1572ef27-d6c0-4641-8f9e-24f0c4531a0f@googlegroups.com> <b9a5ab53-0046-4757-817b-761ec8e1db1d@googlegroups.com> <6666f49c-5282-445f-8098-b56aa9c9d225@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 11:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> wrote:

> It would be nice if somebody would create a version of Python that didn't depend on an operating system. I know that their are a couple of statup projects that advertise that it is 'Python Porcessor' but I suspect it is embedded LINUX. 

There are a few real ones, but some only define a subset of 
the python engine bytecodes.  

Since Python runs on a byte token stack engine, writing this 
in Forth would look easy.  Especially as you don't need to 
do the compiler, just use the PC version of Python. 

The size of the task starts to grow when you notice that when 
the python byte code engine does a DUP to copy an integer, 
it not only copies the integer object reference, but must also 
bump the object reference count. 

I think it would be great to have the python byte code engine 
written in Forth.  Like Forth, python functions can return 
multiple items, and source code looks clean and simple. 

My favourite python feature is the unconstrained integers. A 
256 bit initialisation constant for FPGA memory can be operated 
on just like any other integer. 

When can we start? 

Jan Coombs. 
-- 
email valid, else fix dots and hyphen
jan4clf2014@murrayhyphenmicroftdotcodotuk

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 15:52 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 23:46 +0000
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 17:24 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 17:33 -0700
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-24 21:44 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-25 14:47 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 18:42 -0400
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 19:43 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-25 20:08 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-25 21:41 -0700
          Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-25 22:43 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-26 11:42 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-26 20:50 +0000
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 18:07 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 13:11 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-26 21:11 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2015-03-26 22:14 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-28 16:57 -0700
            Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-03-28 17:18 -0700
              Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 11:05 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-02 10:20 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-04-02 11:25 +0000
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 09:23 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-06 10:51 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 13:55 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-07 20:18 +0100
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-07 19:02 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 16:10 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Raimond Dragomir <raimond.dragomir@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:57 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 00:06 -0700
                Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-03 09:00 -0700
  Re: Rockwell R65F11 Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-04-08 08:27 +0100
    Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 12:22 -0700
      Re: Rockwell R65F11 hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-24 13:38 -0700
        Re: Rockwell R65F11 Derek Simmons <dereks314@gmail.com> - 2015-04-25 08:35 -0700

csiph-web