Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #26109

Re: Why Forth?

From anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Why Forth?
Date 2013-10-04 07:09 +0000
Organization Institut fuer Computersprachen, Technische Universitaet Wien
Message-ID <2013Oct4.090932@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> (permalink)
References <87vgd4y86f.fsf@byelka.ecal.co.jp> <1a00228b-f5ba-493e-9f4e-e00ef5e76801@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


mentifex@myuw.net writes:
>On Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:05:17 PM UTC-8, Alex Shinn wrote:
>> I was wondering if someone could enlighten me as to 
>> the strengths of Forth over other languages. 
[...]

Is Google Group reviving ancient threads, or is there a different
reason for having several answers to postings from 2002 recently?

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2013: http://www.euroforth.org/ef13/

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Why Forth? mentifex@myuw.net - 2013-10-03 21:25 -0700
  Re: Why Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-10-04 07:09 +0000
    Re: Why Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-10-04 04:41 -0500

csiph-web