Groups > comp.lang.forth > #26108 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Forth?

Started by	mentifex@myuw.net
First post	2013-10-03 21:25 -0700
Last post	2013-10-04 04:41 -0500
Articles	3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.forth

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

  Re: Why Forth? mentifex@myuw.net - 2013-10-03 21:25 -0700
    Re: Why Forth? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-10-04 07:09 +0000
      Re: Why Forth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-10-04 04:41 -0500

#26108 — Re: Why Forth?

From	mentifex@myuw.net
Date	2013-10-03 21:25 -0700
Subject	Re: Why Forth?
Message-ID	<1a00228b-f5ba-493e-9f4e-e00ef5e76801@googlegroups.com>

On Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:05:17 PM UTC-8, Alex Shinn wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could enlighten me as to 
> the strengths of Forth over other languages. 

Forth is especially good for Artificial Intelligence 

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Mind.Forth 

http://www.nlg-wiki.org/systems/Wotan 

and robotics. I have recently begun publishing 
the line-by-line documentation of my Forth AI 
code on Amazon Kindle for 99 cents as with the 

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00FKJY1WY 

InFerence module e-book that has 25 chapters: 
Introduction; Function; Code; Purpose; 
Logic; Belief; Volition; Robots; Synergy; 
Forth; JavaScript; Troubleshooting; 
AI Minds in English; Wotan AI in German; 
Dushka AI in Russian; Polyglot AI Minds; 
Porting; History; Future; MasPar; 
Superintelligence; Singularity; 
Links; Glossary; Variables. 

Arthur
-- 
http://www.amazon.com/Arthur-T.-Murray/e/B004OKWAM8/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#26109

From	anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl)
Date	2013-10-04 07:09 +0000
Message-ID	<2013Oct4.090932@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
In reply to	#26108

mentifex@myuw.net writes:
>On Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:05:17 PM UTC-8, Alex Shinn wrote:
>> I was wondering if someone could enlighten me as to 
>> the strengths of Forth over other languages. 
[...]

Is Google Group reviving ancient threads, or is there a different
reason for having several answers to postings from 2002 recently?

- anton
-- 
M. Anton Ertl  http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/home.html
comp.lang.forth FAQs: http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/forth/faq/toc.html
     New standard: http://www.forth200x.org/forth200x.html
   EuroForth 2013: http://www.euroforth.org/ef13/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#26111

From	Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid>
Date	2013-10-04 04:41 -0500
Message-ID	<g6ednYp4-qDPENPPnZ2dnUVZ_vadnZ2d@supernews.com>
In reply to	#26109

Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> mentifex@myuw.net writes:
>>On Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:05:17 PM UTC-8, Alex Shinn wrote:
>>> I was wondering if someone could enlighten me as to 
>>> the strengths of Forth over other languages. 
> [...]
> 
> Is Google Group reviving ancient threads, or is there a different
> reason for having several answers to postings from 2002 recently?

I wonder.  Still, it was nice to see the neat Y combinator, so I can't
complain.

Andrew.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

csiph-web

Re: Why Forth?

Contents

#26108 — Re: Why Forth?

#26109

#26111