Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Self-taught C |
| Date | 2012-02-09 23:45 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20120209153724.408@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <slrnjj59g4.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <8ef87352-c927-4704-8f14-91e809e8a789@db5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <1d1858b8-d8ff-4f43-b06a-3bc8a3ca9327@m7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> <jh0hrn$n6a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <12f86c4d-8431-46a5-a8ae-d27590e3caeb@v2g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> |
On 2012-02-09, Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> wrote: > On Feb 9, 1:31 pm, Rui Maciel <rui.mac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Malcolm McLean wrote: >> > X is fundamentally misdesigned, because the idea is that the "client", >> > which means sever, sends a stream of bytes over a network to the "X >> > sever", which means client. However virtually no systems work like >> > that, and in fact it's hard to get interactivity if the client is >> > remote. >> >> If I'm not mistaken, the X window system was developed with remote clients >> in mind and in a time where remote clients were the norm. So, with that in >> mind, I don't agree that X was fundamentally misdesigned. >> >> Fast-forward 30 years, nowadays we have clients sending and receiving >> streams of bytes over a network to/from a server in order to provide a >> graphical user interface, but instead of the X window system we have the >> world wide web. So, although it's a slightly different abstraction level, >> it's essentially the same thing. >> > The problem is that the messages were wrong. In X the server sends a > message "A key was pressed" and the client has to send back a mesage > "please draw the letter X in such and such a font in that window". So > of course the poor user would hammer the key again, then get a row of > xes, then press delete several times, delete the lot, then tap the x > key once, deliberately and smartly, and go for a coffee until he could > type in the next character. I sat in a lab full of X window terminals at university and don't remember any of these problems. X does require a fairly low latency connection to the server in order to be useful. > With the web interface the server says "put up an edit box". The > client then allows the user to enter text. It then tells the server > "the user has finished putting text into the boxes you told me to put > up, and here's what he wrote". But this basically brings you back to a command line interface. You can't compare a window system with detailed mouse and keyboard events to form submission (which requires some kind of GUI underneath it). That is completely moronic. If form submission were enough, we wouldn't have Javascript for developing "desktop-like" apps (which don't even come close, usually). Javascript can render the browser unresponsive, and is a gaping security hole. I use the NoScript FireFox extension to explicitly allow Javascript on a site-by-site basis.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Self-taught C Sleepy Duke <josh.izzard@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Self-taught C "Bl0ckeduser ." <bl0ckedusersoft@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 11:54 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:34 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-04 05:38 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-08 16:42 +0000
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-08 11:50 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 22:07 +0000
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-13 17:25 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:42 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 05:05 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 13:31 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 06:39 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 07:53 -0800
Re: Self-taught C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-09 09:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2012-02-09 12:34 -0800
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-09 16:06 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2012-02-09 14:17 -0800
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-09 17:46 -0500
Re: Self-taught C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-18 01:08 +0000
Re: Self-taught C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-02-19 18:23 +0100
Re: Self-taught C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-09 14:38 -0800
Re: Self-taught C jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-09 21:52 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:08 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:16 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 00:39 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-10 10:50 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 22:21 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-09 23:45 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 16:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 11:24 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 23:19 +0200
Re: Self-taught C Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-02-22 08:54 +0100
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 00:38 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 00:07 -0500
Re: Self-taught C jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-10 20:34 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-09 23:36 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Self-taught C gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 03:49 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 22:12 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-02-14 14:50 +0000
Re: Self-taught C 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-14 09:49 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 04:23 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-06 22:34 -0700
Re: Self-taught C Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201202.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-02-07 10:26 +0100
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 02:18 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-07 22:28 +0000
Re: Self-taught C JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-02-08 04:05 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 10:31 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:51 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 21:26 -0500
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-07 07:53 -0500
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-02-07 09:26 -0800
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 17:45 +0000
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 18:07 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:56 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:53 -0800
csiph-web