Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Self-taught C |
| Date | 2012-02-13 17:25 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <4F398DD8.4000900@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <31563930.2206.1328289840372.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqmo42> <406b297b-eab0-4cd3-81bc-9339a18cb178@hb4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <slrnjj59g4.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> <4F32A7C0.4020509@verizon.net> <slrnjjj2dg.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
On 02/13/2012 05:07 PM, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-08, James Kuyper wrote:
>> On 02/08/2012 11:42 AM, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
>> ...
>>> {{Unix bigot mode|
>>> Unix in general makes it easier to write programs which are small and
>>> have a simple interface, yet are useful. I haven't tried it, but I
>>> imagine the threshold is much higher on Windows.}}
>>
>> If you haven't tried doing it on Windows yet, what is it you're
>> comparing Unix against when you say it's "easier"? I know there's things
>> other than Unix and Windows, but the significance of your statement
>> would be easier to evaluate if we knew what you were comparing Unix with.
>
> With Windows, like I wrote. I base that on what I see as a Windows
> user: none of the tools I use there are ones I could easily write
> myself. On Unix, several of them are.
I'll agree with your observation, and your conclusion might be correct,
but your argument connecting the two doesn't hold up. The lack of
Windows programs with small, simple interfaces might not be because it's
hard to create such programs. To mention one alternative possibility
(which is inconsistent with my own prior experience with Windows - but
that's 20 years out of date), it might be so easy to create such
programs that as soon as developers get them working, they almost
immediately decide to add more features, so they're no longer small and
simple. Without actual recent experience with Windows development,
neither of us is qualified to speculate on how the developer's design
decisions might be shaped by the features of the Windows API.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Self-taught C Sleepy Duke <josh.izzard@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 09:24 -0800
Re: Self-taught C "Bl0ckeduser ." <bl0ckedusersoft@gmail.com> - 2012-02-03 11:54 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:34 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-04 05:38 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-08 16:42 +0000
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-08 11:50 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 22:07 +0000
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-13 17:25 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:42 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 05:05 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 13:31 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 06:39 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 07:53 -0800
Re: Self-taught C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-09 09:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2012-02-09 12:34 -0800
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-09 16:06 -0500
Re: Self-taught C Patrick Scheible <kkt@zipcon.net> - 2012-02-09 14:17 -0800
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-09 17:46 -0500
Re: Self-taught C "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-02-18 01:08 +0000
Re: Self-taught C "io_x" <a@b.c.invalid> - 2012-02-19 18:23 +0100
Re: Self-taught C blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-09 14:38 -0800
Re: Self-taught C jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-09 21:52 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:08 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-09 16:16 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 00:39 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-02-10 10:50 -0600
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 22:21 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-09 23:45 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-02-09 16:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 11:24 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 23:19 +0200
Re: Self-taught C Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2012-02-22 08:54 +0100
Re: Self-taught C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-02-10 00:38 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 00:07 -0500
Re: Self-taught C jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-02-10 20:34 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-02-09 23:36 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-09 22:14 -0700
Re: Self-taught C gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-10 03:49 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-13 22:12 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-02-14 14:50 +0000
Re: Self-taught C 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-02-14 09:49 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-05 04:32 -0800
Re: Self-taught C gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 04:23 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-02-06 22:34 -0700
Re: Self-taught C Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201202.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-02-07 10:26 +0100
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-07 02:18 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-02-07 22:28 +0000
Re: Self-taught C JohnF <john@please.see.sig.for.email.com> - 2012-02-08 04:05 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 10:31 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:51 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 21:26 -0500
Re: Self-taught C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-07 07:53 -0500
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 14:29 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2012-02-07 09:26 -0800
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 17:45 +0000
Re: Self-taught C notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2012-02-07 18:07 +0000
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:56 -0800
Re: Self-taught C Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-09 00:53 -0800
csiph-web