Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality |
| Date | 2012-01-24 03:48 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20120123194642.176@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | <16c3fab7-bcd4-40dd-8208-93e7358dec1e@kn4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <ad3ff3b8-b520-40f0-8e73-4a66a1426e37@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <ln8vkywdi3.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <4F1E03FE.B21@mindspring.com> <lnhazl7u10.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
On 2012-01-24, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: > pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes: >> Keith Thompson wrote: >>> ~= >> >> ITYM != > > Yes, thanks. > > Your correction would have been even more helpful if you'd quoted some > context. Kids, it should be obvious that the context is the C programming language which has no ~= operator. The irony.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can function pointers be compared for equality "V.Subramanian, India" <subramanian100in@yahoo.com> - 2012-01-23 05:54 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2012-01-23 07:00 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-01-23 07:46 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-23 20:42 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:04 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 10:24 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 16:48 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:04 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:37 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-23 21:39 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality gwowen <gwowen@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:31 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality ec429 <ec429@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-01-24 13:16 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-23 22:11 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 11:34 +1300
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-01-23 16:37 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 09:11 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-01-23 20:06 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-23 17:45 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 03:48 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-01-23 22:59 -0500
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-01-24 04:22 +0000
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-01-24 03:07 -0800
Re: Can function pointers be compared for equality Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-01-24 11:16 +0000
csiph-web