Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #646600
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole |
| Followup-To | sci.physics.relativity |
| Date | 2017-08-20 12:00 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1917242.irdbgypaU6@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <59987B7D.5CAE@ix.netcom.com> <evre1dFit6kU1@mid.individual.net> <W_mdnUFuQPT_YAXEnZ2dnUU7_83NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Followups directed to: sci.physics.relativity
Tom Roberts amok-crossposted across 4 newsgroups without F’up2: > […] some types of black holes have "another side", and some do not. See also <http://jila.colorado.edu/~ajsh/insidebh/> p. > The black hole formed by a collapsing star has no "other side". > > The Schwarzschild manifold does have "another side", but it is not > possible for a timelike or null object to cross from one to the other. If that is so, why do you think that a black hole (BH) formed by a collapsing star cannot possibly be described by the Schwarzschild metric (non-rotating, uncharged BH)? > The Kerr manifold has an infinite number of "other sides", and with care a > timelike or null object can transition in one direction from one to the > other. But there is no going back. If that is so, why do you think that a BH formed by a collapsing star cannot possibly be described by the Kerr (rotating, uncharged BH) or Kerr–Newman metric (rotating, charged BH)? F’up2 <news:sci.physics.relativity> -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-19 10:55 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-19 20:23 +0200
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-19 11:50 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-20 13:16 +0200
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-23 09:08 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-26 09:45 +0200
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-08-19 22:09 -0500
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-08-20 12:00 +0200
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-21 11:32 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-22 00:17 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-22 20:33 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-23 09:21 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-24 09:15 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-08-24 17:12 +0000
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-08-20 09:20 -0400
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 07:03 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2017-08-20 07:19 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-08-21 11:34 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2017-08-22 19:40 +0200
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-08-24 16:16 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 16:43 -0700
Re: The Other Side of a Black Hole "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-08-27 19:08 -0700
csiph-web