Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #73325

Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X

From Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.system
Subject Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X
Date 2015-04-17 16:56 +1200
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <170420151656392409%YourName@YourISP.com> (permalink)
References <55301d7f$0$1615$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> <170420151210129973%YourName@YourISP.com> <barmar-1F664A.20380816042015@88-209-239-213.giganet.hu> <5530755d$0$54657$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <5530755d$0$54657$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com>, JF
Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:
> On 15-04-16 20:38, Barry Margolin wrote:
> > 
> > Yeah, it seems like they're just allowing for the possibility.
> 
> Correct. But what it says is that what has become a brand "OS-X" is not
> assumed to remain such forever.

Except that's only their (and your) opinion. It's not based on any
actual facts.



> (It could be argued that once Apple released 10.10 , the odds if OS-X
> moving to OS-XI seems to be lower.

Apple would be better off dropping the silly "X" entirely and simply
having iOS and MacOS ... or possibly at some stage simply AppleOS.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-16 16:37 -0400
  Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-17 12:10 +1200
    Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-16 20:38 -0400
      Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-16 22:52 -0400
        Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-17 16:56 +1200
          Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 10:10 -0400
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 08:15 -0700
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-17 17:44 +0000
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 10:57 -0700
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 11:02 -0700
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-17 19:05 +0000
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 10:05 +1200
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 19:13 -0400
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 12:05 +1200
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 23:06 -0400
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 15:37 +1200
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2015-04-17 23:46 +0000
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-17 20:00 -0400
  Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-16 21:20 -0700

csiph-web