Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #73301

Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X

Show all headers | View raw

In article <55301d7f$0$1615$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>, JF
Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> wrote:

> From a Sony-Canada contract with Netflix:
> 
> 2.4A Exception Claiuse for Standard Definition, Uncompressed Digital
> Outputs on Wondiws-based PCs, Macs running OS X or higher and PCs
> running Chrome OS with a Widevide DRM described in Section 1.2.3.): HDCP
> must be enabled on all uncompressed digital outputs (e.g. HDMI, Disoplay
> Port), unless the customer's system cannot support HDCP.
> 
> 
> The interesting part is the assumption in contracts that OS X
> (pronounced "ten") could go to OS eleven within the timeframe of the
> contract (generally a couple of years).
> 
> and BTW, Better Call Saul contracts were signed in december 2013, well
> before it became public that the series would actually be made.

You're reading far too much into the simple wording of a third-party
contract which really has nothing to do with Apple. It's possible that
Mac OS X may become "Mac OS XI" or be renamed to something else
entirely at some stage, but Sony are not going to be in any position to
know that.

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-16 16:37 -0400
  Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-17 12:10 +1200
    Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-16 20:38 -0400
      Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-16 22:52 -0400
        Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-17 16:56 +1200
          Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 10:10 -0400
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 08:15 -0700
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-17 17:44 +0000
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 10:57 -0700
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-17 11:02 -0700
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2015-04-17 19:05 +0000
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 10:05 +1200
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 19:13 -0400
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 12:05 +1200
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> - 2015-04-17 23:06 -0400
                Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2015-04-18 15:37 +1200
            Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2015-04-17 23:46 +0000
              Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X JF Mezei <jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca> - 2015-04-17 20:00 -0400
  Re: Hint on future branding of OS-X Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2015-04-16 21:20 -0700

csiph-web