Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1813
| From | Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees |
| Date | 2017-01-17 22:39 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <17-01-007@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <17-01-002@comp.compilers> <17-01-005@comp.compilers> <17-01-006@comp.compilers> |
On 2017-01-17, Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your responses! > > Your responses together with acm.org/dl(of which I > am currently not a member of) helped me mark > down the todos. > > For those of you interested, I have some questions: > > Specific > > Q: What happens when we balance a syntax tree ? Something pretty obviously silly; why don't you try a toy example? The structure of a syntax tree is of utmost significance; it reflects the structure of the grammar rules to which it corresponds. Balancing operations wreck structure, preserving only the inorder traversal. If you wreck the structure, you wreck the syntax. If this isn't clear, you will likely struggle later in the course even though these answers will get you through the current homework round.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternatives to Syntax Trees Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> - 2017-01-15 16:52 -0500
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-15 22:31 +0000
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 06:11 -0500
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2017-01-16 12:12 +0000
Alternatives to Syntax Trees Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 14:16 +0530
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 22:08 -0500
csiph-web