Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1808
| From | Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Alternatives to Syntax Trees |
| Date | 2017-01-15 16:52 -0500 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <17-01-002@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
Hi,
Are there alternatives to syntax trees(i.e. the tree data structure)
when compiling via yacc or yacc like tools ?
Sincerely,
Seima Rao.
[There's quadruples, doubly linked lists of data structures. They
make it easier to rearrange code, but harder to do just about anything
else. There's also DAGs, which are trees that can have shared subtrees,
useful when you're doing common subexpressions or tail merging. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Alternatives to Syntax Trees Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> - 2017-01-15 16:52 -0500
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-15 22:31 +0000
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2017-01-16 06:11 -0500
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees rpw3@rpw3.org (Rob Warnock) - 2017-01-16 12:12 +0000
Alternatives to Syntax Trees Seima Rao <seimarao@gmail.com> - 2017-01-17 14:16 +0530
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Alternatives to Syntax Trees George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2017-01-17 22:08 -0500
csiph-web