Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #451681
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Light Slowing Down |
| Date | 2018-03-06 13:56 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1670758.xfkgZQccNf@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <ugb1w2gthjm0$.j9f3xp1p05dw.dlg@40tude.net> <7389214.tq6mBWv9hf@PointedEars.de> <1eof3h0gwssir.vt0qg64z57gc.dlg@40tude.net> <1618000.3BxZ7HhmIv@PointedEars.de> <1fguaqkb98g12$.ff35oljh0u0a$.dlg@40tude.net> |
SolomonW wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 11:57:20 +0100, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> […]
>> The assumption of local light speed constancy[¹] is not really debated in
>> science anymore (beyond crackpot circles) because all experiments in the
>> past 300+ years have confirmed it without a reasonable doubt. And AISB
>> often, if it were fundamentally wrong, you would not be here: *beyond*
>> experiments, it turns out that local light speed constancy is essential
>> to processes in nature, and to how modern technology works. Thus it is
>> accepted as scientific truth since *at least* 1983 (35 years ago).
>>
>> See also the BIPM resolution on the metre definition of 1983, and the
>> recent discussions here about it, for details.
>> […]
>> ___________
>> ¹ As you can read in Davis & Lineweaver 2003: “The speed of photons
>> relative to us (the slope of the light cone) is not constant, but is
>> rather v_{rec} − c. Photons we receive that were emitted by objects
>> beyond the Hubble sphere were initially receding from us (outward
>> sloping lightcone at t ≲ 5 Gyr). Only when they passed from the
>> region of superluminal recession v_{rec} > c (gray crosshatching)
>> to the region of subluminal recession (no shading) can the photons
>> approach us”. [Speeds away from the observer have a positive
>> sign, speeds towards the observer a negative sign, by convention.]
>
> Here are two papers, that argue otherwise
Otherwise than *what*, full-quoting idiot?
> http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217732389002471
Of 1989. Disproved by COBE, WMAP, Planck, etc.
> https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9211020
Of 1992/1998. Also, it does say already in the abstract: “After the
critical time t_c, local Lorentz (and diffeomorphism) invariance is
restored and light travels at its presently measured speed.”
You really need to read beyond the title and the first sentence.
PointedEars
--
Q: What happens when electrons lose their energy?
A: They get Bohr'ed.
(from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Light Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 16:31 +0000
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-04 18:08 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-03-05 19:08 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-05 11:58 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-03-06 08:22 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-05 22:51 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-03-06 19:08 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-06 11:57 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-03-06 23:01 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-06 13:56 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-03-07 13:54 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-07 06:57 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-03-07 17:19 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 12:52 -0500
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-12 02:24 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SoloomonW@citi.com.au> - 2018-03-05 19:06 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-03-05 12:39 +0100
Re: Light Slowing Down mlwozniak@wp.pl - 2018-03-05 05:38 -0800
Re: Light Slowing Down mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-05 12:12 -0800
Re: Light Slowing Down mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-05 17:33 -0800
Re: Light Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:18 +0000
Re: Light Slowing Down SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2018-03-06 08:34 +1100
Re: Light Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 21:53 +0000
Re: Light Slowing Down mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-05 12:39 -0800
Re: Light Slowing Down Keith Stein <keithstein111@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 08:59 +0000
csiph-web