Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.mobile.android > #37767
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: Android 6 |
| Date | 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <160120171535315385%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <26aa4a1e-1283-465b-010d-f0d53655763e@arnowelzel.de> <040120171014560164%nospam@nospam.invalid> <6c4edf24-6085-bebe-504d-8b3458643c2a@arnowelzel.de> <110120171305446505%nospam@nospam.invalid> <4b02037a-1aeb-9f8d-251c-4b525fc330f8@arnowelzel.de> |
In article <4b02037a-1aeb-9f8d-251c-4b525fc330f8@arnowelzel.de>, Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> wrote: > >>>> Flash memory may get slower when *writing* a lot of data, because of > >>>> wear leveling more blocks get written at least once and have to be > >>>> erased before you write something. Exactly this is, what TRIM does: > >>>> erasing unused blocks in the background, so they are ready when you need > >>>> them. > >>> > >>> negligible, if at all. > >> > >> You call a factor of 2 or more "negligible"? SSDs lose about 50% speed > >> over time without TRIM. > > > > no they absolutely do not. complete bullshit. > > They do. That's why TRIM was invented. Why should one invent something > like TRIM if it doesn't matter if blocks have to be erased before > writing on them? trim came to be when the firmware on ssds were primitive. that hasn't been the case in *years*. ssds garbage collect on their own now and have for a long time, making trim nice to have but *not* required. the fact is that ssds do *not* lose 50% speed in a few years. absolute bullshit, as anyone who has had an ssd for a while can attest.
Back to comp.mobile.android | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 17:21 +0000
Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2016-12-22 10:00 -0800
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 00:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:30 -0500
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2016-12-23 12:42 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2016-12-23 11:58 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:43 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:33 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 08:59 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:20 +0100
Re: Android 6 AL <45364747@invalid.com> - 2017-01-04 10:06 -0700
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 09:00 +0100
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-05 01:34 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-07 14:14 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-07 13:09 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-08 18:18 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-08 15:42 -0500
Re: Android 6 The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com> - 2017-01-08 17:11 -0800
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-08 20:19 -0500
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:07 +0100
Re: Android 6 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2017-01-08 21:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-09 23:55 +0000
Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-24 10:49 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-22 23:55 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-22 19:15 -0500
Re: Android 6 Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> - 2016-12-23 05:46 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 00:15 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 17:11 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-23 12:43 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-23 21:22 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-24 14:29 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 11:10 +0000
Re: Android 6 Piet <www.godfatherof.nl/@opt-in.invalid> - 2016-12-25 12:37 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-25 11:18 -0500
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-25 20:28 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:45 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 18:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:24 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:04 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:11 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:23 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:39 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-30 15:34 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-30 22:26 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2016-12-31 13:27 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-31 11:55 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:11 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-04 13:40 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-04 10:14 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-11 18:12 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-11 13:05 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-13 17:24 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-15 18:23 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-15 21:30 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:42 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-16 15:35 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-17 05:44 +0100
Re: Android 6 Daniel James <daniel@me.invalid> - 2017-01-17 17:47 +0000
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-01 01:05 +0000
Re: Android 6 tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-01-02 02:08 -0500
Re: Android 6 David Taylor <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:01 +0000
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-01-02 08:51 -0500
Re: Android 6 Bill <Billaboard@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 20:41 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:18 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2017-01-04 09:14 +0100
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 14:05 +0100
Re: Android 6 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-12-29 12:02 -0500
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 23:46 +0100
Re: Android 6 Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-12-31 20:18 +0000
Re: Android 6 Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2016-12-29 13:47 +0100
csiph-web