Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1632
| From | "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Advice on C libraries |
| Date | 2015-10-07 22:13 -0400 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <15-10-005@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
I'm working with some people who are building a C language toolchain for a new 64 bit architecture. A large part of the work is getting the usual libraries to work. The obvious choice would be glibc, except that the C compiler is not gcc, and getting glibc to work with anything else is not for the faint of heart or short of time. We're looking at musl which seems quite promising, small, looks well coded, MIT license. Anyone have experience with it or advice to offer? Here's a not necessarily unbiased comparison of four open source C libraries: http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html R's, John
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Advice on C libraries "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-10-07 22:13 -0400 Re: Advice on C libraries arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2015-10-08 06:11 +0000 Re: Advice on C libraries George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 23:51 -0400 Re: Advice on C libraries "lpsantil@gmail.com" <lpsantil@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:53 -0800
csiph-web