Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #1633
| From | arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Advice on C libraries |
| Date | 2015-10-08 06:11 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <15-10-006@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <15-10-005@comp.compilers> |
The Google / Android "bionic" C library may be of interest as well. The various *BSDs all have reasonable C libraries (POSIX compliant etc.) If you're not targeting Linux specifically, then avoiding GLIBC probably is a good idea. My two cents. Arnold In article <15-10-005@comp.compilers>, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote: >I'm working with some people who are building a C language toolchain >for a new 64 bit architecture. A large part of the work is getting >the usual libraries to work. > >The obvious choice would be glibc, except that the C compiler is not >gcc, and getting glibc to work with anything else is not for the faint >of heart or short of time. We're looking at musl which seems quite >promising, small, looks well coded, MIT license. > >Anyone have experience with it or advice to offer? -- Aharon (Arnold) Robbins arnold AT skeeve DOT com
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Advice on C libraries "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2015-10-07 22:13 -0400 Re: Advice on C libraries arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) - 2015-10-08 06:11 +0000 Re: Advice on C libraries George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2015-10-09 23:51 -0400 Re: Advice on C libraries "lpsantil@gmail.com" <lpsantil@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 15:53 -0800
csiph-web