Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #559583
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? |
| Date | 2016-03-05 17:42 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1491572.M2Z3oQJHfI@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <0c11b935-67aa-40a9-aba9-9b4ee6db93ae@googlegroups.com> <2847267a-1c5c-40d3-981f-88b2c0b2f6fd@googlegroups.com> <nba3bg$1th6$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1559788.f7NWEUn2RC@PointedEars.de> <483e47f5-4353-4361-b010-7e559b74e237@googlegroups.com> |
jay moseley wrote: > Tom... Not even close friends call me “Tom”. Learn to quote instead. >> Once again, gravity waves are not gravitational waves. >> >> Gravity waves can be observed daily on Terra with the naked eye, in the >> oceans and the clouds. > > Under GR the books are cooked What is that supposed to mean? > so any LIGO observation can only be spuriously attributed to GR. The predictions that GR makes and that can be derived from GR have been confirmed in numerous other experiments in the 100 years before this one. If the attribution of the LIGO observations to GR is “spurious”, then all those other experiments are as well. The chances of that are zero. > But if you wish to distinguish the LIGO observations from tides, > you would be making an erroneous claim. You are the one making erroneous claims here. > LIGO observed a distortion in distance in the setup. Yes. Precisely, a propagating distortion of spacetime. > A*classical * effect called strain . > Not a relativistic effect. Incorrect. The observed kind of strain is precisely what was predicted by Einstein 100 years before. Non-relativistic strain can been excluded because of the precautions taken in the experiment. > It is only an assumption that it was caused by GR magic, There is no magic in GR. > as it (LIGO anomaly) can just as easily be modeled classically. Not in the observed way, and not under these conditions. PointedEars -- Q: Who's on the case when the electricity goes out? A: Sherlock Ohms. (from: WolframAlpha)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 19:29 +0000
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 12:35 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 05:25 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 08:08 -0600
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 17:42 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 12:19 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:21 -0600
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 22:01 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:14 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 16:24 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-06 08:22 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:44 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-07 20:52 +0100
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-07 12:54 -0800
Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:09 -0600
csiph-web