Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #559528

Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves?

From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves?
Followup-To alt.1d
Date 2016-03-05 12:35 +0100
Organization PointedEars Software (PES)
Message-ID <1559788.f7NWEUn2RC@PointedEars.de> (permalink)
References <0c11b935-67aa-40a9-aba9-9b4ee6db93ae@googlegroups.com> <2847267a-1c5c-40d3-981f-88b2c0b2f6fd@googlegroups.com> <nba3bg$1th6$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.1d

Show all headers | View raw


Helénē Swanhild wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Obnoxious liar.

> JanPB wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 9:10:14 AM UTC-8, Pentcho Valev wrote:
>>> Since general relativity is an empirical model, it can predict anything
>>> - e.g. both existence and non-existence of gravitational waves. Or both
>>> static and expanding universe. Or both constant and variable speed of
>>> light. Anything!
>> 
>> Not even wrong. Simply N/A.
> 
> You not, of course.

Gibberish.

> Pentcho is 100% consistent.

The gibbering, ’nym-shifting troll still does not know the difference 
between “consistent” and “correct”.

> Relativity is been invented

Relativity is not an invention.

> BEFORE the discovery of an Universe being in expanding mode.

Instead, general relativity (1915) suggested to Lemaître in 1927 that it 
could be a correct description of reality even in an expanding universe, and 
Hubble showed the expansion of our universe in 1929 as a side-effect of his 
astronomical observations.

> And Relativity remained valid.

Relativity as it is commonly understood nowadays includes two theories, the 
special theory of relativity (special relativity, less commonly abbreviated 
“SR”), and the general theory of relativity (general relativity, commonly 
abbreviated “GR”).

Theories are not considered “valid” at any point in their existence.  The 
’nym-shifting troll still has not understood that theories come along with 
uncertainties.  However, those theories have been experimentally confirmed 
many times.  No modern device would work if they were fundamentally flawed 
as no microchip would work as designed then.

> It does not really mater whether the Universe is expanding or not, or,
> whether the misunderstood Gravity Waves are real and detectable or not.

Once again, gravity waves are not gravitational waves.

Gravity waves can be observed daily on Terra with the naked eye, in the 
oceans and the clouds.

Gravitational waves have been detected by LIGO recently with a statistical 
significance of 2σ, i.e. a probability of 95.4499736 %.  Future detections 
by LIGO and similar experiments on Terra and in outer space are expected.

The one who has misunderstood everything is, once again, only the ’nym-
shifting troll.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_wave>
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave>

> Relativity will still be valid. Nor whether the Speed of Gravity (SoG)
> coincide with the Speed of Light (SoL). Relativity will still be valid.
> You don't know your own theory. Moreover, SR will still be valid, GR or
> not, at ANY value of c, be that whatever. That's why is been said

Rather vomited into science newsgroups by nobody but the ’nym-shifting 
troll.

> that SR is a stronger and more fundamental theory than GR. GR
> is based only on suppositions and postulates. SR is not. SR is clean.

Not even wrong.

*PLONK*


PointedEars
-- 
Q: Who's on the case when the electricity goes out?  
A: Sherlock Ohms.

(from: WolframAlpha)

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Helénē Swanhild <helenes@gardenclosure.org> - 2016-03-03 19:29 +0000
  Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 12:35 +0100
    Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 05:25 -0800
      Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 08:08 -0600
      Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 17:42 +0100
        Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 12:19 -0800
          Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:21 -0600
          Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-05 22:01 +0100
            Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-05 14:14 -0800
              Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-06 16:24 +0100
                Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-06 08:22 -0800
                Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-03-07 00:44 -0800
                Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-07 20:52 +0100
                Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-03-07 12:54 -0800
      Re: Does General Relativity Predict Gravitational Waves? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-03-07 09:09 -0600

csiph-web