Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #18522
| From | nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.apps |
| Subject | Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) |
| Date | 2013-10-14 07:23 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <141020130723263314%nospam@nospam.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <3bCdndfNbMn4rsTPnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <121020131049065852%nospam@nospam.invalid> <1laokg7.1ysocm8ofbufzN%jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz> <121020132108446521%nospam@nospam.invalid> <bc0uq9Fph0iU1@mid.individual.net> |
In article <bc0uq9Fph0iU1@mid.individual.net>, Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@powys.org> wrote: > > and no matter what anyone chooses, there will always be someone with a > > horror story. > > Agrred. ieard someone saying a year of so ago that at least three > backups should be made to give some confidence of recovery. the more important the data, the more backups you should have, with at least one should be off site. > The three backups should be of different types (I have a Time machine, a > SuperDuper and Varbon Copy Cloner). > > The three backups should be on different media (I have two backup drives > on my Ageing mac Pro plus a couple of Network Servers. good advice. > Preferably the backups should be in different places so I'm building a > garden shed, insulated and heated, for my workroom and will have one of > the network servers left in the house. an off site backup needs to be much more than in a garden shed. should disaster strike, you might not have either one. an off site backup could be at a friend or relative's house many miles away, or maybe even across the country, or in the cloud. > I don't use any Cloud facilities as they could go broke at a moment's > notice and pull the plug on me. a backup drive could 'go broke' at a moment's notice. the cloud is just *another* backup, not the only backup. if they go poof, it's no big deal, just find another cloud service. the only hassle is uploading, but some accept hard drives for the initial backup. > And they probably charge for a Terabyte > of storage. <http://news.yahoo.com/yahoo-reboots-flickr-offers-1-terabyte-storage-23 3556967.html> Yahoo Inc. said at an event in New York City's Times Square on Monday that it is now offering users 1 terabyte of online storage for free. > And replace the disc drives every few years. that too.
Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) licensedtoquill@gmail.com - 2013-10-08 07:15 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) ggrandish@gmail.com - 2013-10-08 15:54 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) licensedtoquill@gmail.com - 2013-10-08 16:57 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-09 14:20 +1300
Re: (I should probably post this elsewhere) licensedtoquill@gmail.com - 2013-10-08 20:52 -0700
Re: (I should probably post this elsewhere) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-09 18:08 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) me@home.spamsucks.ca (Király) - 2013-10-09 12:58 +0000
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) licensedtoquill@gmail.com - 2013-10-10 13:46 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2013-10-12 04:32 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-12 10:49 -0400
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-13 13:09 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-12 21:08 -0400
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Tim Powys-Lybbe <tim@powys.org> - 2013-10-14 02:13 +0100
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-14 07:23 -0400
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-13 13:09 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2013-10-13 08:22 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-14 07:58 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2013-10-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-14 13:06 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2013-10-14 07:38 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-15 04:44 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2013-11-06 09:58 -0800
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) William Munny <will@bigwhiskey.gov> - 2013-10-08 19:23 -0400
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-09 12:45 +1300
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) William Munny <will@bigwhiskey.gov> - 2013-10-10 16:57 -0400
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) licensedtoquill@gmail.com - 2013-10-14 18:06 -0700
Re: Disastrous incompatibility between iphoto and time machine (10.8.5) jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-15 17:11 +1300
csiph-web