Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #22585
| Message-ID | <13124040.1SXmGGuGdH@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2014-01-12 21:51 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <larc8g$s3c$1@dont-email.me> <hdq2d9p4tjse2t0isfv010f2m9f0fn7gdl@4ax.com> <52d1792f$0$6555$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1590346.McO4MUtrrQ@PointedEars.de> <52d2f7f4$0$9522$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net> |
Christoph Michael Becker wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> The methods of Employee instances here are “privileged“ and the variables >> are “private” (terms coined by Douglas Crockford, IIRC), because only >> those methods can access those variables/pseudo-properties. It is the >> closest equivalent to private/protected properties in class-based OOP. > > AIUI, this technique has a memory overhead, however, as references to > the functions would have to be stored once per object instance (opposed > to functions referenced from properties of the prototype object). Yes, it is a tradeoff. Someone had suggested privileged *prototype* methods instead, but that only helps if all instances should share the variable values. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example "Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson@telia.com> - 2014-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-11 16:37 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-01-11 15:58 +0000
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-01-11 18:02 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-11 20:07 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2014-01-12 21:15 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2014-01-12 21:51 +0100
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2014-01-14 09:56 +0000
Re: Why do I have to use the keyword this in my Employee example JJ <duh@nah.meh> - 2014-01-11 23:10 +0700
csiph-web